Agenda 05-04-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Steering Committee Minutes Page 2 May 4, 1995 • Issues related to industrial development such as increased tax base and local jobs were discussed. Steve Ach reviewed 6 areas (Areas A through F) as possible locations for industrial development, as referred to in his memo to the Steering Committee dated May 4, 1995. Bill Birrenkott stated that the problem with many of the areas mentioned is the lack of available sewer and water. He questioned if there are restrictions to prevent establishing smaller-sized sewer and water districts to service these areas. Steve Ach explained that Terry Maurer is researching the feasibility of setting up a small water and sewer district in the southeast area of the City. Steve noted that the City of Ramsey has stated their intent to bring water and sewer up to the City's southeastern boundary. Discussion followed regarding purchasing services from Ramsey vs. establishing a small sewer and water district to serve the southeast Highway 10 corridor. Bill Birrenkott stated he felt the Committee should decide where industrial development should occur based on best use of land and accessibility to highways, and that economics will determine how the property is serviced with water and sewer. Pat Dwyer commented that Areas A and B appear to be a natural extension of City water and sewer. He expressed concern with Area C for industrial use • because of its close proximity to the river, and felt that should be used for residential. Pat stated that other areas such as E, D and F could be developed with smaller uses without city water and sewer. Mary Eberley suggested that public park land could be set aside in planning an industrial park near the river. Discussion followed regarding competition with neighboring communities for industrial development. Bill Rubin explained that competition is based on the level of incentives cities are willing to provide. Pat Dwyer stated that the areas identified are likely to be long-term prospects and that areas for immediate needs should be considered. Bill Rubin explained developers have indicated there is a real need for industrial property in Elk River. He suggested that area C may be a good option for a highway industrial, multi-tenant, office/warehouse development. Steve Ach stated industrial uses along Highway 10 after the Kelley Farm would create a "softer" entrance to the City, rather than the more intense, highway commercial uses. Mary Eberley stated she supported Areas A and B since these areas are close to city water and sewer. Also, she supported Area C,with a use as suggested by Bill Rubin. III