Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to the Planning Commission/P 97-12 <br /> December 23, 1997 <br /> Page 8 <br /> • • Refuse Collection/Mail Delivery <br /> 1. It is not clear where refuse collection will occur for the commercial and <br /> assisted living. This will need to be shown on revised plans. <br /> 2. Location of mailboxes should be considered. A cluster mailbox design <br /> will be recommended. <br /> • Lighting <br /> A complete lighting plan shall be provided illustrating lighting contours, <br /> foot candle measurements and types and sizes of lights. <br /> Recommendation <br /> The plans currently lack a lot of the detail that the Planning Commission <br /> typically has a chance to review. However, if the Planning Commission is <br /> comfortable forwarding this project on to the City Council, staff recommends <br /> the following conditions: <br /> A. Recommend approval of the Land Use Plan Amendment from MR <br /> (Medium Density Residential) and HR (High Density Residential) and <br /> HB (Highway Business) based on the following findings: <br /> 1. The land use plan amendment is consistent with the proposed <br /> planned unit development. <br /> 2. Land Use Amendment provides a tiering of intense land use <br /> adjacent to highway intersection to a lower density adjacent to <br /> the lake. <br /> 3. The land use amendment is consistent with the City's land use <br /> plan strategy to focus commercial at signalized intersections and <br /> having complimentary land uses surround the commercial. <br /> B. Rezoning from R2 (Two Family Residential) to PUD (Planned Unit <br /> Development) based on the following findings: <br /> 1. Recent frontage road improvements have changed the character <br /> of the property to warrant a rezoning. <br /> 2. A planned unit development allows a comprehensive review of <br /> developing the property. <br /> i <br /> f:\shrdoc\planning\pc\p97-12x3.doc <br />