My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-1983 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
09-19-1983 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:46 AM
Creation date
4/13/2005 3:29:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
9/19/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />September 19, 1983 <br />Page Four <br /> <br />6. Heavenly Hills Road Improvement <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that at the August 1, 1983 City Council meeting, <br />the City Council authorized the City's engineer to prepare plans and specifications <br />and obtain bids for the Heavenly Hills road improvement project. The City Admini- <br />strator further indicated that Thursday, September 8th, the City received bids rang- <br />ing from $112,916 to $130,580, with the low bidder being S & LExcavating. The <br />City Administrator indicated that in the S & L Excavating bid for the Heavenly Hills <br />project, there is $16,000 for hauling excess dirt from the site. The City Admini- <br />strator further indicated that it is recommended by the engineer and the City staff <br />that the $16,000 dirt-hauling item be deleted from the project and that the excess <br />dirt be wasted on the site or stockpiled for hauling by the City's crews. The City <br />Administrator indicated that with the dirt-hauling item deleted from the construc- <br />tion bid, the low bid would be $97,000. The City Administrator then reviewed addi- <br />tional costs to the project as stated in his memo to the Mayor and City Council <br />dated September 15, 1983. The City Administrator inddlcated that if the assessment <br />method used is as proposed at the public hearing, the resu~g cost on a per lot or <br />per unit assessment would be $4,573.00. The City Administrator further indicated <br />that this cost is based upon several assumptions: if the project is completed in <br />the fall of 1983, engineering fees would be reduced by several thousand dollars, as <br />additional staking would not be necessary in the spring of 1984. The City Admini- <br />strator further indicated that there may be additional costs, should there be problems <br />in obtaining easements or if there would be legal challenges and further indicated that <br />these costs could range anywhere from $5,000 to $10,000, depending on the nature of <br />the challenge and the amount of legal time required. The City Administrator indicated <br />that these additional costs could increase the assessment approximately $400 per <br />lot. <br /> <br />Councilmember Duitsman questioned the time of the assessment of the project. The <br />City Administrator indicated that the project would be assessed in 1984 for 1985 <br />collection. <br /> <br />Ms. Kitty Omitt questioned the possibility of deleting the $16,000 for dirt removal. <br />Ms. Omitt further indicated that it was her understanding that the acceptance of a <br />bid as submitted was required by law. The City Administrator indicated that the <br />$16,000 could be deleted by a change order. <br /> <br />Mr. Terry Maurer of Consulting Engineers, presented to the City Council various asses- <br />sment'options. Discussion was carried on regarding the various options, the amount of <br />proposed annual payments, and the fact that the assessment could be paid off at any <br />time. <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Tralle requested that the City Council address the issue of obtaining <br />easements necessary for the project. Mr. Terry Maurer indicated that there were <br />five properties from which easements had to be obtained. Mr. Maurer reviewed those <br />easements on a map for the City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Ron Wurm, one of the property owners from which an easement is needed, indicated <br />that he felt his property was already too close to the road and further indicated that <br />he felt an easement should be worth something in compensation and therefore, he would <br />not give the easement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.