Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />be improved. Mr. Phil Hals, StreetJsuperintendent indicated that the Street <br />Department is getting ready to do t e grading work on the public portion. <br />I <br />Ada Jedneck asked why Kampas would f!ot be assessed for a portion of the road as <br />they own property along the opposit side of the private road. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt the City Council should discuss and make <br />a decision regarding the acceptance of a 24 foot road width rather than the 30 <br />foot width. Discussion was also cartried on regarding other roads comparable <br />to 211 th located within the City. I <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regardingtthe possibility of lot splits in the area, <br />and increased residents and traffic on the 24 foot proposed roads. The City <br />Administrator indicated that the Ci y Council has the power and authority to <br />determine what density is allowable Ifor a specific road. <br />I . <br /> <br />Mr. Jedneck questioned the possibil~ty of the City paying the Kampa portion of <br />the road and then when the property Iwassold or lot splits made, the assessment <br />would be paid and the City would geJ their money back. Further discussion was <br />carried on regarding the acceptance of a 24 foot road width versus a 30 foot <br />road width. Discussion was also ca ried on regarding the possibility of cutting <br />the cost of the improvement by havi g the Street Department do the work. Mr. <br />Jedneck indicated that he would donJte a truck and driver for the road improvement <br />. I <br />construct10n. I <br /> <br />Councilm ember Gunke.l indicated tha.t~She was not in favor of a 24 foot road width. <br />Councilmember Duitsman questioned w 0 would pay for the improvement if the road <br />was upgraded at a later date. The ity Administrator indicated that the City <br />Council may want to refuse subdivis.ons in the area unless the residents wanted <br />to upgrade the road at their cost. , <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regardingJthe assessment of the Kampa property. Mrs. <br />Kampa indicated that they did not w nt to pay an assessment for the improvement <br />of the private road and further ind~cated that they woul& not give an easement <br />if they were assessed for the impro'fement cost. The City Administrator indicated <br />that the City Staff would have to review the cost of building the road and submit <br />an estimate or proposal to the City Icouncil for consideration. <br /> <br />Councilmember Duitsman indicated th1t the retaining of the funds until the lots <br />are split and then assessed would ber a viable option for the road improvement <br />costs. ! <br />I <br /> <br />Council Minutes <br />August 15, 1983 <br />Page Six <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO CON INUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2UTH AVENUE <br />ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT UNTIL SOME FURTHER INFORMATION COULD BE OBTAINED FROM <br />THE CITY STAFF. COUNCILMEMBER GUNK LSECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br />I <br />11. Majkrzak Variance Request/Public He~ring <br />I <br />The City Administrator indicated thdt Mr. Michael Majkrzak of 13131 Mississippi <br />Road has requested a rear yard and J sideyard setback variance so that he may keep <br />