My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-1983 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
08-15-1983 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:46 AM
Creation date
4/13/2005 3:29:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
8/15/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Council Minutes <br />August 15, 1983 <br />Page Five <br /> <br />he believed developers have rights to develop a project whereby they may corne out <br />on the project. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that he felt Block 5 should have <br />a buffering from Elk Hills Drive. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE DENSITY INCREASE OF THE BARRINGTON <br />PLACE PUD AS FOLLOWS: BLOCK 1 TO REMAIN THE SAME AS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED IN THE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN; BLOCK 2 INCREASE DENSITY FROM 20 TO 40 UNITS: <br />PHASE II PORTION OF BLOCK 3 - 13 TO 25; BLOCK 4 - 54 TO 72; AND BLOCK 5 - 19 TO 30; <br />AND TO REQUIRE A SCREENING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BLOCK 5 AND BLOCK 2 OF THE PUD. <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />Counci1member Schuldt indicated that he was in agreement with Counci1member <br />Duitsman's motion except that he felt Block 2 should be increased to 30 units <br />rather than 40 units. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO AN INCREASED DENSITY FOR <br />BLOCK 2 FROM 20 TO 30 UNITS. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE AMENDED MOTION. <br />THE AMENDED MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE THE HIGHEST DENSITY <br />OF BLOCK 5 BE DEVELOPED TO THE SOUTH OF BLOCK 5. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED <br />THE AMENDED MOTION. THE AMENDED MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />THE ORIGINAL MOTION WITH AMENDMENTS PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />9. Kreuser Administrative Subdivision Request/Public Hearing <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Gene Kreuser has requested an adminis- <br />trative subdivision for property in Palmers First Addition to allow three existing <br />lots of record to be consolidated into two lots. The City Administrator indicated <br />that City Staff finds that there are no particular problems associated with the <br />subdivision requested by Mr. Kreuser, and therefore, it is recommended that the <br />City Council grant approval to the Administrative Subdivision request of Mr. Gene <br />Kreuser for lots 1, 2, and 3 of Palmers First Addition. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or 1n opposition of <br />the administrative subdivision request. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION REQUEST OF <br />MR. GENE KREUSER FOR LOTS 1, 2, AND 3 IN THE PALMERS FIRST ADDITION. COUNCILMEMBER <br />DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />10. 211th Avenue Road Improvement Project/Public Hearing <br /> <br />Mr. Terry Maurer of Consulting Engineers Diversified reviewed the feasibility <br />report for the 211th Avenue Road Improvement Project. Mr. Maurer indicated that <br />the cost of the road improvement for each parcel would be very high because of <br />the fact that there are only 4 or 5 parcels. Mr. Maurer indicated that if the <br />City would approve a 24 foot road width rather than a 30 foot road width, the <br />cost could be reduced. Mr. Maurer indicated that the approximate cost for the <br />private portion would be $6,100 per unit. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding the cost of the project and how those costs <br />would be paid. Mr. Ron Beck questioned when the public portion of the road would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.