My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1997
>
01-11-1997
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2018 11:55:42 AM
Creation date
4/13/2018 11:55:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> For example,one Symposium participant observed ground noise levels(about 5 to 15 microwatts,or <br /> that, for tower-mounted omnidirectional base 1 to 3%of the 1992 ANSI uncontrolled standard), <br /> station antennas,measured exposures near ground "bur far,far below any standards that are used to <br /> level are less than one microwatt per square protect health." <br /> centimeter—less than 0.2%of the 1992 ANSI Another participant shared measurement data <br /> standard.The participant also observed that direc- taken in the vicinity of several different base <br /> tional antennas result in very low ground-level stations.At a distance of about 100 feet from a <br /> exposures.Based on the participant's measure- tower supporting several directional antennas,in a <br /> ments of exposures from base stations mounted on <br /> shopping-centerlot,typical midday cellular <br /> office-building roofs,the only time exposures even PPS parking <br /> approach 1992 ANSI limits is when one gets with- power densities were"2 to 15 nanowarts per square <br /> in a yard or so of an actual transmitting antennas centimeter...extremely low..."16 That is less than <br /> themselves—as opposed to an inert metal pole 0.002%of the 1992 ANSI uncontrolled limit.17 <br /> At another directional base station,with roof- <br /> which supports such an antenna up in the air <br /> mounted antennas about 16 feet up in the air, <br /> Other Symposium participants provided similar exposure levels at three to six feet above the roof <br /> observations, based on their own measurements. line were 5 to 15 microwatts per square centime- <br /> You may recall from Chapter 2 that as cellular ter.This is about 0.9% to 2.6%of the 1992 ANSI <br /> traffic increases,base-station antenna heights and uncontrolled exposure limit, but the roof was <br /> ERPs decrease.Because exposure levels rise closer inaccessible to the general public.Measured power <br /> to an antenna but decrease as ERP falls,the two flux densities were about 0.2%to 0.6%of the 1992 <br /> factors tend to cancel each other out.One partici- ANSI controlled limit. <br /> pant described surveying the interior of a hospital Because actual measurements require sophisticated <br /> adjacent to a building with a roof-mounted base <br /> station.The base station's signal levels were at equipment and can be time consuming and costly, <br /> 4110 <br /> background noise levels in the hospital kitchen, engineers have developed various techniques for <br /> and from 1 to 3 microwarts per square centimeter predicting exposure levels.One participant <br /> on a terrace and in other parts of the 27th floor— described a sophisticated method of computer <br /> very low levels.In another setting,one floor below analysis that takes into account a base station's <br /> a roof-mounted base station(a vertical distance of antenna types,antenna heights,transmitter powers, <br /> about 10 to 15 feet),exposure levels were 10 number of active channels,and the effects of any <br /> microwatts per square centimeter—less than 2% intervening construction materials.This method <br /> of the 1992 ANSI limit for uncontrolled settings. allows estimates of exposures to people within,say, <br /> an office building that has a base station mounted <br /> A Symposium participant also described measure- on its roof.The participant described a good corre- <br /> merits at a base station with wall-mounted direc- lation between the predicted exposures and those <br /> tional antennas designed to serve the inside of an actually measured. <br /> office building.Measured signal levels were within The participant described how he had used this <br /> 1992 ANSI limits except in the immediate vicinity method to analyze a proposed base station at a fire <br /> and in the main beam of the antenna.The signals station.The proposal had engendered some <br /> measured in the equipment room,behind the controversy among area residents.For many years, <br /> antenna's reflector and therefore outside the main the fire department had used the tower for its own <br /> beam, were extremely weak,essentially at back- antennas.The highest predicted signal levels from <br /> ground-noise levels. <br /> the base station would be about 3.5 microwatts <br /> One participant reported that the EPA had per square centimeter,less than 0.7%of the 1992 <br /> surveyed typical background noise levels from all ANSI uncontrolled exposure limit.In fact,the par- <br /> sources(including TV and FM broadcast stations) ticipant observed,exposure from the fire depart- <br /> in a variety of settings,and had arrived at an average merit transmitter was probably much higher than <br /> level of 0.005 microwatts (five nanowarts)per any from the base station. <br /> square centimeter.That is less than 0.00190 of the Several participants observed that exposures <br /> 1992 ANSI limit for uncontrolled exposures.The • <br /> from cellular towers are usually less than those <br /> participant observed that,close to a base station, <br /> exposures usually are considerably above back- from UHF TV stations,police and fire radio <br /> transmitters, and FM broadcast stations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.