My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1996
>
04-23-1996
>
5.5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2018 9:21:39 AM
Creation date
4/9/2018 2:59:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Planning Commission <br /> April 23, 1996 <br /> Page 4 <br /> The Current Proposed Rezoning <br /> The City of Elk River is proposing to rezone a number of properties to conform <br /> with recent amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. As part of this proposal, an area <br /> along Highway 10 would be rezoned from R-1 a to I-1. Approximately 60 acres of the <br /> ANC property located south of 165th Street (which is subject to the 1995 conditioned <br /> use permit) are affected by this proposed rezoning. These 60 acres would be rezoned <br /> from R-1 a to I-1 under the proposal. <br /> To our surprise, we were told in late February by Planning staff that this proposed <br /> rezoning may make the affected 60 acres of the ANC a non-conforming use. The basis <br /> for this Planning staff conclusion is apparently that the area in question previously has <br /> been permitted as a "feedlot" and feedlots are not permitted uses within the 1-1 zone. <br /> We were told by Planning staff that the Planning Commission would take up the <br /> proposed rezoning on May 27, but there would be discussion of the non-conforming use <br /> issue prior to that time so there would be no impact to Cargill's operations. <br /> • Just over a week ago we learned second-hand that the proposed rezoning had <br /> been moved up to April 23. Late last Friday, we received a staff memorandum - not <br /> only discussing this non-conforming use issue, but recommending a course of action <br /> inconsistent with long-standing activities at the ANC. Planning staff has never <br /> presented any of its concerns directly to Cargill. If we had not requested this <br /> memorandum after learning of it second-hand, we would not have even known that the <br /> Planning staff was proposing action that is incompatible with Cargill's past and intended <br /> future uses. <br /> The Planning staffs memorandum is very disturbing, both because of the <br /> Planning staff's failure to even discuss the matter with us, and more importantly, <br /> because the memorandum's conclusions seem without recognition of pertinent legal <br /> principles and relevant facts, many of which have existed for years. The Planning staff <br /> is recommending action which would make the ANC (or at least a significant portion of <br /> it) a non-conforming use under the Zoning Code. Such a result obviously is not <br /> acceptable since it drastically alters Cargill's long-standing authorization to conduct its <br /> operations in Elk River as a conforming use, and impairs our ability to continue our <br /> activities in the future. <br /> What is particularly unfortunate is that we believe that an issue has been raised <br /> here where none exists. The ANC is a permitted use in the I-1 zone. A "research <br /> laboratory" is one of four permitted uses in the I-1 zone. Elk River Zoning Code § <br /> 900.10(14)(A)(iii); the ANC is, and for nearly forty years has been, such a research <br /> • facility. The ANC is comprised of various structures and activities dedicated solely to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.