My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Untitled
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
10-26-1995
>
Untitled
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2018 12:28:56 PM
Creation date
4/6/2018 3:19:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 24, 1995 <br /> Dear Louise, <br /> I am writing you this note because I will not be able to attend Thursday nights Planning <br /> Commission public hearing of the Draft Comprehensive Plan. <br /> I am currently the chair of the Elk River Park and Recreation Commission and its <br /> representative to the Steering Committee. I would like to take this opportunity to share some <br /> general comments about our Draft Comprehensive Plan. Because transportation and parks will be <br /> discussed at future meetings, I will not comment on those issues at this time. <br /> I had hoped to be able to review staffs recommendations prior to writing this note, but as <br /> of late Tuesday, October 24th, they were not available. <br /> As I am sure you are aware, there was a significant amount of public input on several <br /> • issues throughout the Steering Committee process. This public input is generally reflected in on <br /> recommendations and I would like to address two of those issues which are tied closely together <br /> and those are residential land use and extension of the urban service area. <br /> The overwhelming sentiment of long time residents and newcomers alike is the desire to <br /> plan for growth that will maintain or improve the "quality of life"we now enjoy. While those <br /> words cover a very broad range of issues, the main theme always seemed to be to maintain the <br /> "rural character" of our community. <br /> The steering committee made recommendations regarding the extension of urban services <br /> to impact commercial and industrial opportunities much more significantly than residential. We <br /> made this decision based on a number of factors of which maintaining rural character was most <br /> significant. Other issues were residential tax burden, traffic, impact on schools and city services, <br /> and amount of wet lands and utility corridors which significantly affect the net amount of land that <br /> can be developed which, in turn, affects the cost effectiveness. <br /> Still, the basic issue is , what do we want our community to look like in the future? We <br /> must remember community growth should be planned and not driven by developers requesting a <br /> zoning change or expansion of our urban service area to utilize sewer plant capacity. <br /> The other issue which the steering committee discussed that relates to "quality of life" and <br /> "maintaining rural character"is allowing or requiring significant open space to be designed into <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.