My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.8 PCSR 08-22-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
08-22-1995
>
5.8 PCSR 08-22-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2018 2:34:10 PM
Creation date
4/6/2018 2:34:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to the Planning Commission-Ord. 0A95-13 Page 2 <br /> August 22, 1995 <br /> • relaxing in the backyard and typically, most residents like to see some space <br /> as a buffer to homes located behind their parcel. In a survey of other <br /> communities, Elk River had the smallest rear yard setback of all (see <br /> attached survey). Most cities require a rear yard setback between 20 and 30 <br /> feet. In our review of past single family building permits, rarely are homes <br /> located any where close to the 10 feet rear yard setback. Most meet a <br /> minimum of a 30 foot rear yard setback. Attached to your report is a drawing <br /> of the minimum size lot allowed in the Ric zoning district (80' x 125' - 10,000 <br /> sq. ft. in size.) The sketch indicates that a 25 foot rear yard setback would <br /> not jeopardize the placement of a building or home on the property. In this <br /> example, a front yard setback in the Rlc zoning district is 30 feet. A typical <br /> house is approximately 45 feet in width. Therefore, there still is a minimum <br /> of 50 feet from the rear of the home to the back property, which is ample <br /> room to construct a deck or 3-season porch, etc. and still meet the proposed <br /> 25 foot rear yard setback. <br /> Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the code <br /> amendment as proposed in the attached ordinance. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> s:planning:pc:oa95-13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.