My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.8 PCSR 08-23-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1994
>
08-23-1994
>
5.8 PCSR 08-23-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2018 9:06:57 AM
Creation date
4/6/2018 10:06:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 <br /> July 24, 1990 <br /> . the C-2 uses were more appropriate than the C-3 uses. Commissioner <br /> Eberley stated that the location of this property dictates that C-3 <br /> would be a logical zoning classification, however, C-2 is more <br /> appropriate in her estimation because of the proximity to single family <br /> residential dwellings. Commissioner Eberley also stated that along with <br /> traffic, safety is a number one concern with her, and she felt that <br /> possibly a foot bridge over Hwy. 169 would eliminate some of the safety <br /> concerns. Commissioner Nadeau stated that he would like to see no <br /> development go into this parcel until the intersection of Elk Hills <br /> Drive and Hwy. 169 is cleaned up. However, he felt that C-2 uses were <br /> more appropriate than C-3. Chairman Kimball stated that there were a <br /> number of technical questions which still needed to be answered, but <br /> that these would be resolved prior to the City Council meeting in <br /> August. Commissioner Johnson questioned whether PUD Agreements had an <br /> expiration date. Tim Keane, City Attorney, stated that PUD Agreements <br /> bind developers to certain tasks and responsibilities. The expiration <br /> of the PUD Agreement is determined by events and not dates. Mr. Keane <br /> went on to explain that there is great latitude in PUD Agreements, and <br /> that a number of controls could be implemented through this document. <br /> COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF <br /> THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A PUD REFERENCING STAFF'S MEMO <br /> DATED JULY 19, 1990, AS THE FINDINGS OF FACT, AND THAT THE APPROVAL BE <br /> SUBJECT TO THE SAME STIPULATIONS AS OUTLINED IN STAFF'S MEMO AND THAT <br /> THE FOLLOWING ISSUES BE RESEARCHED FURTHER: <br /> • 1. THAT THE ISSUE OF PARKING ON DODGE AVENUE BE ADDRESSED BY THE CITY <br /> ENGINEER. <br /> 2. THAT THE PROPOSED BIKE PATH LOCATION BE DISCUSSED IN FURTHER <br /> DETAIL. <br /> 3. THAT A TRAFFIC COUNT AND STUDY OF THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT THIS <br /> AREA IS ABLE TO HANDLE BE CONDUCTED. <br /> 4. THAT THE POSSIBILITY OF CONSTRUCTING A FOOT BRIDGE OVER HIGHWAY <br /> 169 BE RESEARCHED. <br /> 5. THAT THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 169 AND DODGE AVENUE BE STUDIED <br /> TO DETERMINE HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD AFFECT IT. <br /> COMMISSIONER NADEAU SECONDED THE.MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> 6. Consider Conditional Use Permit (Daycare) By 1st Step Preschool/P.H. <br /> Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that the applicant <br /> (Paulette Hanlon) is proposing a preschool, which would accommodate up <br /> to 20 children at a time in the existing Central Lutheran Church <br /> located at 1103 School Street. Daycare facilities for more than 17 <br /> children are a conditional use in the R-4 zone. <br /> • Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. There being no one for or <br /> against the request, Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.