09-22-1986 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 5 e City Council Minutes September 22. 1986 Mr. Tim Hiller of 19340 Norfolk questioned whether there is a way to stop the project at this point. The City Engineer stated that there is no way to terminate the contract without paying a penalty. Mr. DuWayne Moll of 11882 193rd Lane stated he was objecting to the overlay project because of the sewer problems in the area. Mr. Wayne Ruckle of 19354 Oxford questioned the basis of the decision to overlay the streets. The Street Superintendent stated that the roads were very thin. Jeanne Eggert of 19319 Oxford stated she was opposed to the project because of the sewer problems in the area and the possibility of well contamination. She stated she felt that City utilities would be put in the area soon because of the sewer problems. Mr. Dale Martin completed. The depending on the of 19426 Norfolk questioned when the project would be City Engineer stated the project would be started soon weather. e Councilmember Gunkel stated that at the first public hearing ordering the project the only concern which was voiced was the fact that not enough properties were being assessed. Councilmember Gunkel stated that the Council did address this concern by adding certain properties to the project. She then asked for a show of hands of the people who had attended this public hearing. Four people in the room indicated they had attended the public hearing in which the project was ordered. Councilmember Engstrom stated he had the same concerns as Councilmember Gunkel. He stated the people at the Council meeting tonight should have been present with their concerns regarding sewer problems at the first public hearing. Debbie Anderson problems. She two months. not want to see of 19358 Norfolk stated they had extensive sewer stated they had to have their septic tank pumped every She indicated they have now corrected the problem and do City utilities come in at this time. Mr. Gary Kruger of 19337 Norfolk Street stated he was opposed to the assessment because he felt the roads by his home were in good condition. He stated he lives on a deadend street and the road gets very little traffic and therefore. is in good condition. Ms. Jane Titrud stated she wanted it in the minutes that she favor of City sewer project. but that she would like evaluation of the area done before new roads are put in. was not in to see an e Mr. Ken Nolte of 19388 Oxford Street questioned what would happen if he paid the $1.000 assessment charge in full and the assessment was adopted for $950 per lot. would he receive the extra money back that he paid. Mr. Maurer stated that the money would be refunded.