Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />PAGE 9 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />July 14. 1986 <br /> <br />NSP <br /> <br />Emissions will be checked. Equipment installed to monitor <br />temperature combustion efficiency. carbon dioxide. etc. Before RDF <br />plant can start operation. testing is done at different level loads <br />and under various conditions. by independent testing lab. check <br />criteria and noncriteria pollutants. Check for correlation between <br />their daily monitoring and independent testing results. If <br />abnormality in daily testing instrumentation. alarm goes off. PCA <br />checks their records. results sent to PCA quarterly. <br />Instrumentation is also checked periodically. <br /> <br />Roh1f- Spoke with PCA. noncriteria pollutants have no standards yet. he <br />feels that doesn't necessarily mean they are not harmful. When <br />data available to PCA showing them harmful. then they will do <br />something about it. <br /> <br />Gunke1- <br /> <br />Scrubbers are latest <br />feels scrubbers should <br />to protect environment. <br /> <br />technology. designed to remove pollutants. <br />be required to insure every effort is made <br /> <br />UPA <br /> <br />Referred <br />combination. <br />collected in <br />gases. <br /> <br />to study done in Quebec. RDF with scrubber/baghouse <br />Author has since stated that 99% of pollutants were <br />baghouse. Scrubber reduces the temperature of flue <br /> <br />Project cost 29 million. cost of <br />approximately 20%. <br /> <br />scrubbers <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />million. <br /> <br />Hink1e- Asked NSP if installation of scrubbers is possibility. <br /> <br />NSP Feels money could be better spent for pollution control elsewhere. <br />that baghouse would be effective for the RDF. <br /> <br />Gunke1- Concerned that landfill would by used by others for ash disposal <br /> <br />UPA - Responsible for deposit of ash. <br /> <br />Hink1e- Would like incorporated into <br />community would be responsible <br />Elk River Landfill would not get <br /> <br />conditional use permit that each <br />for own percentage of ash. so that <br />it all. <br /> <br />Hink1e- Who monitors ash? <br /> <br />UPA They would have independent testing agency monitor. Take mixture <br />of fly ash and bottom ash. determine toxicidy of ash. <br /> <br />NSP Do not know at this time whether or not ash will go to Elk River <br />Landfill. <br /> <br />Fuchs- Concerned about health hazard. <br />