My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-1986 CC MIN - JOINT
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
07-14-1986 CC MIN - JOINT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:44 AM
Creation date
4/12/2005 3:09:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
7/14/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />PAGE 10 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />July 14. 1986 <br /> <br />NSP <br /> <br />PCA will determine if there is health hazard. what is acceptable <br />risk. Must pass extensive testing criteria to obtain permit from <br />PCA. Olmsted County near Rochester has obtained mass-burn permit <br />from PCA. Red Wing. Wilmar. mass burn. City of Red Wing has mass- <br />burner. PCA required electrostatic precipitator. <br /> <br />NSP Will send information to City regarding combustion controls. gases <br />and particulates. etc. <br /> <br />Discussion carried on regarding dioixides. furons. are they gases or <br />particulates. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that they would like more <br />information from UPA and NSP. and also to meet with the City consultant. <br />Also they were waiting for the final EIS Report which is to be out <br />approximately July 21st. <br /> <br />10E.Deerfield 3rd Addition <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle explained that the Deerfield 3rd final plat had been denied <br />because the northern access has not been obtained. Mayor Hinkle further <br />explained that since the improvements for Deerfield 3rd had been planned <br />as part of the upcoming bond issue. it must be determined whether or not <br />to scratch the project from the bonds and start over with a new bond <br />issue. <br /> <br />City Attorney. David Sellergren. explained that if the City decided to go <br />ahead and include the Deerfield 3rd project in the bond issue. 5% of <br />the dollar amount must be used within 6 months on the project. and 70% <br />used within 3 years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel stated that she was not in favor of allowing the <br />developer to do the project in phases. She explained that it has been <br />determined that it is not financially feasible to do the improvements in <br />phases. and further that the Council has made a decision to not allow <br />construction until the access is acquired. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Schuldt and Engstrom expressed their agreement not to go <br />ahead with the project until the access is secured. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO EXTEND THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING PAST THE <br />ESTABLISHED 12:00 MIDNIGHT MEETING DEADLINE. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED <br />DROPPED FROM THE BOND ISSUE. <br />THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />THAT THE DEERFIELD 3RD ADDITION PROJECT BE <br />COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.