Laserfiche WebLink
• Mr. Steve Ach <br /> June 15, 1994 <br /> Page Two <br /> 6. It is not clear what the purpose is of Outlot A and Outlot B along the east side <br /> of the plat. <br /> 7. The zoning of this property is PUD; however, the makeup of the lots follows <br /> very closely an R1C zoning. If it were to be evaluated as an R1C zoning, <br /> several of the corner lots are deficient in width. These would include Lots 1, <br /> 12, and 13 of Block 9; Lot 1 of Block 5; Lot 1 of Block 4; and Lot 21 of <br /> Block 3. <br /> 8. There are areas immediately south of Block 4 and south of Block 9 which fall <br /> north of the NSP easement. It is not clear why these areas are not included <br /> in the plat. It does not appear that there are uses for these areas, especially <br /> one adjacent to Block 9, for future phases. Consideration should be given to <br /> including portions of this area in the current plat. <br /> B. Grading and Drainage Plan <br /> • 1. Many of the blocks have rear yard drainage that flows through the middle of <br /> the lots rather than being directed toward the rear lot line and then across <br /> adjacent properties. The grading plan needs to be reconfigured to get <br /> drainage to the rear of the lots before flowing across adjacent properties. <br /> This will eliminate the need for drainage easements across the middle of lots. <br /> 2. There is a low area in Lot 16, Block 9, and also in Lots 18, 19, and 20, <br /> Block 9, and just south of Lot 2, Block 4, which need to be investigated to <br /> determine whether or not they are wetlands. If they are determined to not be <br /> wetlands, but are not filled, then easements need to be provided around them, <br /> especially the one that falls in Lots 18, 19, and 20, Block 9. <br /> 3. It appears that slightly more storm drainage piping will be required to <br /> eliminate long reaches of overland street flow. Also, there is no storm <br /> drainage facilities shown for the low area in front of Lots 3 and 4, Block 4, <br /> on 195th Street. The final drainage plan should conform to the approved <br /> overall plan for the entire Hillside development. <br /> 4. The typical street section shown on sheet 2 of 2 of the grading and drainage <br /> plan is slightly deficient in width. The City requirement is 32 feet face to <br /> face, and the section shown is 32 feet back to back. The thickness of the <br /> section shown is adequate. <br /> • <br />