Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />March 24, 1986 <br />Page Three <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolejs further expressed his concerns if the Council decided to sell the <br />liquor store. He stated that he felt it was important that the Council con- <br />sider setting restrictions for private off sale liquor establishments, such <br />as limiting the number of stores, and setting specifications for size and <br />design of the stores. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding the possibilt~y of passing an ordinance <br />setting limits for off sale liquor establishments. Further discussion was <br />carried on regarding the limitations presently set for on sale liquor opera- <br />tions. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding the potential that exists for lawsuits <br />in the liquor business and the impact a lawsuit could have on the City's <br />economic situtation. <br /> <br />Lori Johnson, Finance Director, reviewed items of concern as stated in her memo <br />to the City Council dated March 18th. Councilmember Williams questioned the <br />value of the municipal liquor store assets. Lori Johnson stated that the land <br />and building was vaulued at approximately $240,000, the inventory at approxi- <br />mately $150,000 and a cash balance of $100,000, for a total of approximately <br />$490,000. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding comments the Council and Citizens Advisory <br />Committee had received regarding the possible sale of the liquor store. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Duane Kropuenskeindicated that some of the calls the Advisory Committee <br />had received were regarding the possible loss of jobs for present liquor <br />store employees. Mr. Kropenske indicated that it should not be assumed that <br />if the store were sold to a private owner, that all the employees would be <br />let go, but even private enterprise, employees are at the same risk, if the <br />owner of the company were to sell his business. Mr. Kropuenske expressed, <br />his concerns if the City were to keep the liquor store; 1) the financial <br />impact a lawsuit would have on the City, 2) the location of the store, <br />3) the inevitible deterioration of the building and added costs, and 4) the <br />need for the City to have better facilities. Mr. Kropuenskeindicated that <br />he felt the City has no choice but to sell the liquor store, as it is the <br />only asset they have that could be liquidated in a relatively short period <br />of time, as a source of funds to finance a new City facility. <br /> <br />Ms. Charlotte Novak expressed her concern that if the liquor store were sold, <br />where would the funds come from to continue City services provided at the <br />present. CouncilmemberSchuldt indicated that that is the important question <br />that must be considered. <br /> <br />Lori Johnson explained that if the Council decided to sell the liquor store, <br />two questions must be placed on the referendum ballot; 1) to use funds <br />generated from the sale of the liquor store business to build a new city <br />facility and 2) to build a new city facility. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding another referendum. It was the general <br />feeling of those present that a third referendum would not be successful unless <br />most of the funds to finance a new city facility were acquired some way, <br />other than by raising taxes. <br /> <br />MAYOR HINKLE MOVED TO DIRECT THE STAFF TO OBTAIN AN MAl PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL <br />FOR THE LIQUOR STORE PROPERTY. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br />MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br />