Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />March 24, 1986 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3) The possibility of a parking ramp being included in the project. <br /> <br />4) The dimensions of legal parking space requirements (10 ft. x 20 ft. for <br />a regular space, 12 ft. x 20 ft. for handicapped). <br /> <br />5) If MSA funds were to be used for improvements on Jackson Avenue in the <br />future, MSA standards would require parallel parking and not angle parking <br />as shown, creating fewer spaces available. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding the municipal utilities operation, the <br />value of the existing land and structure, and whether or not the proposed <br />project would be financially feasible if additional costs were incurred to <br />acquire the utilites property. Mr. Wuornos indicated that the developer would <br />be reviewing these costs when they were available to make a determination. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding the process involved in creating a tax <br />increment district and the possible impact of legislative changes. Council- <br />member Gunkel indicated that it was her understanding that the tax increment <br />financing tool was originally set up for projects of this nature and perhaps <br />the criteria for a project such as this one would remain intact. Council- <br />member Gunkel further indicated that Mr. Dave Sellergren; City Attorney, had <br />recently stated that the legislature had not acted on the tax increment issue <br />this session and since the legislature has now adjourned, nothing would probably <br />happen until they meet again. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle suggested that the developer meet with the utilities and discuss <br />acquisition of the municipal utilities property. Councilmember Gunkel also <br />suggested that once the developer and utilities have met, the Council could <br />meet jointly with the two groups. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Schuldt, Engstrom, Gunkel, and Williams all <br />expressed their support for the project and their willingness to pe~p out <br />any way they can if the project proves feasible. Mayor Hinkle asked Mr. Wuornos <br />to review the concerns addressed by the Council. Mr. Wuornos agreed to take <br />a look at the whole parking issue and to address the municipal utilities <br />acquisition question, and that he would get back to the Council as soon as <br />possible. <br /> <br />5. Discussion of Possible Sale of Municipal Liquor Store <br /> <br />Mr. Fritz Dolejs reviewed for the City Council some of the concerns he had <br />regarding the possible sale of the liquor business, liquor liability was a <br />major issue which the Council should consider; the possibility of a lawsuit <br />and the cost and availability of insurance. He also reviewed the impact of <br />the following items on the liquor store's future: <br /> <br />1) The 21 year legal drinking age law which would cause a cut in sales. <br /> <br />2) The strong probability for legalization of wine sales in grocery stores.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3) The elimination of two grades of beer to only one, allowing strong beer <br />to be sold in grocery stores. <br /> <br />4) Future expenditures that are likely to be necessary such as building <br />improvements and new cash registers. <br />