Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />November 5. 1987 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER TRALLE MOVED TO NOT CHANGE THE LAND USE MAP TO REFLECT THE <br />RECENT ZONING AMENDMENT FOR MR. BARRETT BASED ON THE COMMENTS AND <br />RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PLANNING COMMI SSION. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br /> <br />3. Consideration of Proposed 1988 City Budget <br /> <br />Mayor Gunkel stated that the staff has prepared a balanced budget for <br />1988. The Mayor further reviewed the three revenue options discussed by <br />the Council at its September 29. 1987. meeting and how these different <br />revenue options affected various expenditure proposals. The Finance <br />Director and City Administrator then briefly reviewed the changes from <br />the September 29. 1987. budget proposal discussion that allowed the staff <br />to present a balanced budget at this time. Total expenditures and <br />revenues are projected in the amount of $1.742.550. This reflects an <br />approximately 19% increase over the adopted 1987 City budget. <br /> <br />REVENUES...At the 9/29/87 City Council meeting. revenue option #2 was <br />portrayed as being the most realistic option for the Council to evaluate. <br />Changes from this $1.667.400 revenue projection included: <br /> <br />Adding $10.000 as a juvenile officer State grant; <br />adding $1.500 under administrative project fees; <br />adding $1.000 under plan check fees; <br />deleting $5.350 under the school liaison program; <br />adding $1.000 to fire calls and contracts; <br />adding $1.000 to interest; <br />adding $17.000 to contributions/Municipal Utilities; <br />adding $1.000 under refunds and reimbursements; <br />deleting $10.000 from liquor transfers; <br />adding $50.000 from liquor store reserves; <br />adding $1,000 from sewer transfer; <br />The increase from revenue option #2 was $75.150. <br /> <br />EXPENDITURES...From the 9/29/87 expenditure proposal. the City had to cut <br />$21.750. The main reason the amount of cuts was so low was because of <br />the decision to add $50.000 from the liquor store cash reserves to the <br />revenue section of the budget. It was noted by the Administrator that <br />the use of non-reoccurring revenues to balance the General Fund City <br />Budget is not a practice that should be continued in future years. It is <br />being proposed to be done in 1988 as revenues. and especially revenues <br />from the Municipal Utilities. are anticipated to increase in future <br />years. The reductions from the 9/29/87 expenditure proposal are as <br />follows: <br /> <br />$500 from the Mayor and Council; <br />$4.000 from economic development; <br />$1.000 from building and zoning; <br />$1.000 from data processing; <br />$1.000 from planning; <br />$1.000 from engineering; <br />$3.500 from government buildings; <br />$3.000 from police; <br />