03-20-1989 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Elk River City Council Minutes March 20. 1989 Page 6 e Jody Kreuser. of TLC. stated that they are requesting an addition in order to add a gym and other facilities to their daycare operation. Jerry Schroeder. Planning Commission Representative. indicated that the Planning Commission recommended approval with a 5-0 vote. He further indicated that the Planning Commission recommended approval with certain stipulations which are listed in the memo from the zoning assistant to the Mayor & City Council dated March 20. 1989. Mayor Tralle opened the public hearing. There being no one for or against the matter. Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED. TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY TLC. INC. OF 19027 PROCTOR AVENUE TO EXPAND AN EXISTING DAYCARE BUILDING WITH AN ADDITION OF 5.650 SQUARE FEET TO BE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. THAT THE ENTIRE PLAY AREA BE FENCED. 2. THAT FOURTEEN OFF STREET PARKING STALLS BE PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND THAT THE STALLS BE HARDSURFACED AND DUST FREE AND ALSO THAT THEY BE STRIPED. 3. THAT THE PROPOSED BUILDING BE DECORATED WITH FOUR BRICK COLUMNS AND ARCHITECTURAL PANELS TO MATCH THE ORIGINAL BUILDING. e 4. THAT THE DUMPSTER BE SCREENED AND A LATCHABLE GATE INSTALLED . BE 5. THAT THE SIGNAGE FOR THE DAYCARE BE RESTRICTED TO TWO SIGNS NOT TO EXCEED 32 SQUARE FEET FOR EITHER SIGN. 6. THAT THE DAYCARE BE SUBJECT TO A TWO YEAR REVIEW (0391). 7. THAT THE OWNER WORK WITH STAFF TO RESOLVE THE DRIVE THROUGH PROBLEM. 8. THAT THE BRICK COLUMNS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING BE CONTINUED . 9. THAT THE LAND SCAPING THEME WITH MORE MATURE TREES BE CONTINUED. COUNCIL MEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. e 8.4 City Council/Planning Commission Policy Councilmember Kropuenske indicated that he would like to see a policy set regarding variances that do not meet the five standards. He indicated that he was refering to the variance requested by Security Financial. He stated that the Planning Commission denied the variance and the City Council sent it back to the Planning Commission. the Planning Commission once again denied the request and the applicant is requesting to bring it back to the Planning Commission. Councilmember Kropuenske indicated that if a variance does not meet the five standards the Planning Commission should not hear the request again.