Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 6 <br /> February 5,2018 <br /> ----------------------------- <br /> Ms. Othoudt stated the applicant is requesting to pool the two projects,which is not <br /> specifically addressed in city policy. She stated her recommendation is to consider <br /> Jackson Hills and Elk River Lodge Suites as separate projects. She stated the Hills <br /> project, as a stand-alone project, can be justified through the affordable housing <br /> needs study and it fits within the guidelines of city policy. She stated the Lodge <br /> project, as a stand-alone project, does not meet policy guidelines as it doesn't <br /> generate increment based on the analysis provided by Springsted Consultants. <br /> Ms. Othoudt stated the garages in the Lodge project site would add about $87,500 <br /> worth of new value. She noted the applicant has pulled a permit for the Lodge <br /> project and already commenced construction. She stated construction has already <br /> commenced on the Lodge project and it would be a difficult argument to meet the <br /> but for analysis. She further stated the applicant is legally obligated to build a 25-unit <br /> garage and have onsite parking spaces to convert his property from an extended stay <br /> hotel. She stated the applicant is required to construct the garages/parking with or <br /> without Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in order to make it a legal use. <br /> Ms. Othoudt stated the Finance Committee looked at this project pooled together <br /> and based on city policy,identified more than one public purpose that met the <br /> requirements to extend the terms of the TIF. She stated the Committee <br /> recommended approval for the project for 26 years. <br /> Ms. Othoudt stated the Housing and Redevelopment Authority reviewed the project <br /> and noted two of the five commissioners abstained from voting, one was absent, <br /> which left two to vote. One member agreed with the Finance Committee's <br /> recommendation of a 26-year term for a housing district and the other was more <br /> interested in looking at the policy and the two applications as a separate project. <br /> Ms. Othoudt discussed the options for Council. She stated Council could move <br /> forward with the Jackson Hills project and call for a public hearing on February 20, <br /> 2018. She stated if the Council doesn't feel the project meets city policy objectives, <br /> the project would be dead and come back to Council for formal denial. Ms. Othoudt <br /> noted city policy sets the maximum term at 15 years but state law sets it at 26 years. <br /> Councilmember Ovall questioned the standards for other communities and if the city <br /> is putting itself at a disadvantage by setting a policy maximum of 15 years. <br /> Mikaela Huot, Springsted, explained the different districts and stated most <br /> communities have a goal to reduce the terms of the district to the amount of TIF <br /> needed;hopefully for less than 25 years,noting housing districts are more unique <br /> than other districts and have more flexibility on what the dollars from the TIF <br /> district can be used for. She stated typically they are for acquisition, site <br /> development,anything prior to vertical development, and housing costs. She stated it <br /> really comes down to city policy,which is tied to community goals, and some may go <br /> the longer term because they really need affordable housing. She stated by providing <br /> a housing district, an applicant is agreeing to the affordability for the maximum term <br /> P 0 W I R I D 9 Y <br /> otmaA UREJ <br />