Laserfiche WebLink
recorded in Minnesota near Monticello in 1961, and has since spread throughout the state. <br />Minnesota relied heavily on American Elms (Ulmus americana) as shade trees on streets, <br />with about 140 million in the state at the time of the outbreak. The disease is now present <br />in all Minnesota counties, though elms remain an important component of many Minnesota <br />forests. <br />Emerald ash borer (EAB) is a non-native wood -boring beetle from Asia that was first <br />identified in the United States in the summer of 2002. Likely transported from Asia to <br />Michigan in ash wood used for pallets and other shipping materials, the b etle has now <br />been confirmed in 15 states, including Minnesota. The beetle works by siting larvae <br />under the bark of the tree; these larvae then feed on the wood, even Iy isrupting <br />enough of the phloem to prevent the transport of nutrients throw he tree. While <br />Minnesota's cold weather can stymie the spread of the beetle, ' and o spread, with <br />new outbreaks confirmed in and around the metro area. Qu r es a r ady in place <br />around both Hennepin and Anoka counties, where infest o the borer en <br />confirmed. Both of these counties share a border with erburne county, mea that ash <br />trees within the Conservation Area are at risk. Wit s such. human mov ent of <br />firewood and climate change ever-present, the lik i h l 'might reach the <br />property is high, though the search for effective biologi itrols and other deterrents is <br />ongoing. <br />Unless viable control or treatment option a ed, the qis and ash at the <br />Conservation Area are at risk of dying in th ear n such large trees die, it will <br />have a pronounced effect on the vegetation wat the river. These trees act to <br />shade the water and provide and imp a water quality for fish and other species. <br />When large trees die, they n e canopy create gaps, which in turn releases the <br />understory that was for ly supp ssed by th ade from such trees. If desirable species <br />like native (orbs, gras es, st in the understory, then this can be a <br />good thing, since the resul 0 net increase in bank stability and diversity. In <br />the case of this ora2arty. thes nv Lyans will likelv be filled by buckthorn and Tartarian <br />.tion. In order to avoid this <br />.ioval of undesirable shrub <br />rbaceous plant species is a <br />For green ash in , the situation is particularly important, as this species makes up <br />over 50% of the ca in many areas of the floodplain forest. The principle of risk is <br />highly applicable h e; risk is often defined as the probability of a negative event weighted <br />by its consequences. In the case of EAB, the consequences will be large and quite negative, <br />as a loss of half the canopy on the property could have cascading consequences for invasive <br />species, water quality, and wildlife. The probability that EAB arrives is high, though it is <br />unclear when this will occur. While we plan to remove invasive species prior to this <br />occurring, which will reduce some of the negative consequences, another potential strategy <br />is to proactively remove the ash from the property. This would be a large undertaking, as <br />the ash would have to be removed and replaced by other floodplain species. Removal could <br />be contracted to logging firms, which could potentially fund the work, though the market <br />Friends of the Mississippi W. H. Houlton Conservation Area NRMP <br />77 <br />