Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />August 31, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />7.5% increase over the adopted 1992 budget. The actual dollar amount <br />increase is $213,200. <br /> <br />The City Administrator reviewed each individual departmental budget <br />with the City Council as identified in the background material and as <br />noted in his 8/24/92 memo. During the discussion of each departmental <br />budget, some suggestions for potential cuts were noted and it was <br />indicated by the Council that these items would be considered when the <br />entire budget gap was reviewed at a future meeting. It was noted that <br />the proposed expenditures are $75,650 more than the listed available <br />revenues. <br /> <br />The City Council indicated that a review of Planning Commissioners <br />attending a national conference should be added. to the list of <br />potential budget cuts. It was the general agreement of the City <br />Council that the large 1993 data processing expknses associated with <br />the new City Hall facility should remain outside of the budgeting <br />process and should be funded directly from Equipment Reserves. The <br />City Council acknowledged an increased contribution from Guardian <br />Angels for the Senior citizen Program, in the amount of $2,000 per <br />year, in order to help ensure that there will be no cuts in the work <br />week schedule of the Senior Citizen Coordinator. It was the general <br />"feeling" of the city Council that shifting some expenditures for the <br />Chamber of Commerce to the EDA would be acceptable and that this would <br />be discussed further when the budget gap is reviewed. Additionally, it <br />was the general "feeling" of the City Council that it would be more <br />appropriate to request a contribution from the Municipal Utilities <br />Commission for part of the lump sum payment necessary in order to <br />finance a Fire Department equipment van. This request would be in lieu <br />of a request for an increase in the annual contribution to the City <br />General Fund. As with other budget issues, utility contributions will <br />be further discussed when the budget gap is reviewed at a future budget <br />meeting. No final decisions on any budget changes were made by the <br />City Council at this meeting and only discussion on the budget issues <br />took place. <br /> <br />It was stated that the next budget work session is scheduled for <br />Tuesday, September 8, 1992, at the Elk River City Hall conference <br />room. The budget work session would follow some formal City Council <br />agenda items. At the 9/8 budget work session, the City Council would <br />continue to review the budget issues and specifically address balancing <br />the budget and establishing the proposed maximum levy in order to have <br />the levy information certified to the Council by the September 15, <br />1992, deadline. <br /> <br />8. Staff Updates <br /> <br />8.1. <br /> <br />The City Administrator briefly discussed with the <br />received from the Elk River Landfill Attorney. It <br />meeting to discuss the current disagreement with <br />to be arranged. <br /> <br />City Council a letter <br />was stated that a <br />the Landfill will try <br />