Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Elk River City Council Minutes <br />April 21, 1992 <br /> <br />Parcel '2 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />parcel '3 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT <br />BASED ON THE APPRAISAL <br />ASSESSMENT AMOUNT. <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />$6,943.68 <br />$6,314.43 <br />$8,750.00 <br /> <br />$6,943.68 <br />$6,314.43 <br />$8,750.00 <br /> <br />MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL ON ALL THREE PARCELS <br />REPORT WHICH SHOWS BENEFIT HIGHER THAN THE <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br /> <br />Parcel '1 <br /> <br />Mark and Michelle Davis - 18846 Zumbro Street <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />Parcel '2 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED <br />OWNED BY MARK AND MICHELLE <br />INDICATES BENEFIT HIGHER THAN <br />SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />$6,951.08 <br />$6,321. 07 <br />$9,000.00 <br /> <br />$6,951.08 <br />$6,321.07 <br />$9,250.00 <br /> <br />TO DENY THE APPEAL FOR BOTH PARCELS <br />DAVIS BASED ON THE APPRAISAL REPORT WHICH <br />THE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT. COUNCILMEMBER <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Mrs. Roger Eull - 18880 Boston Street <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment $10,611.33 <br />Proposed Assessment $10,611.33 <br />Appraisal Benefit $18,750.00 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ <br />ON THE APPRAISAL <br />ASSESSMENT AMOUNT. <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL BY MRS. ROGER EULL BASED <br />REPORT WHICH INDICATES BENEFIT HIGHER THAN THE <br />COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br /> <br />Lila Schaefer - 12903 188th Avenue NW <br /> <br />Parcel 'I <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />parcel '2 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />$6,885.62 <br />$6,575.08 <br />$10,000.00 <br /> <br />$3,051. 43 <br />$3,051. 43 <br />$8,250.00 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL <br />SCHAEFER BASED ON THE APPRAISAL REPORT WHICH <br />THAN THE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT. COUNCILMEMBER <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5~0. <br /> <br />OF BOTH PARCELS BY LILA <br />INDICATES BENEFIT HIGHER <br />SCHULDT SECONDED THE <br />