Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Elk River city Council Meeting <br />August 16, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />will be approximately $682,000, and construction will <br />September, and completion in 1994. <br /> <br />in <br /> <br />begin <br /> <br />Bill Rubin, Economic Development Coordinator, stated that the Chuba <br />Company is requesting TIF assistance in an amount up to $60,000. He <br />stated that the TIF funds would be used to reimburse the developer for <br />costs associated with the redevelopment project. He stated that these <br />are eligible costs as permitted by Minnesota Statutes and involve <br />demolition, foundation removal and compaction, and related site <br />preparation expenditures. <br /> <br />Bill Rubin stated that TIF was started as an urban renewal tool. He <br />indicated that the Main Street corridor is a critical corridor in the <br />City of Elk River. He further stated that staff considered other <br />funding options including the Revolving Loan Fund,however, the <br />Revolving Loan Fund would not apply as there would be no security <br />interest with the project. He indicated that staff also considered the <br />option of creating a new TIF District, but it did not meet the <br />requirements of the State Statute. <br /> <br />Jeff Gongo11, representing the Economic Development Authority, stated <br />that the project is a valid project and Mr. Chuba's 1992 project is a <br />proven asset. He indicated that the use of TIF is consistent with the <br />State Statute. He requested that the Council approve staff's <br />recommendation to approve the modification to TIF Plans No. 1 and No.3. <br /> <br />Mayor Duitsman stated that he believes Main Street is an important <br />corridor to the City of Elk River. He further stated that he felt the <br />City could fund up to $50,000 and that the City Council should request <br />the HRA to pick up half of that cost. <br /> <br />Counci1member Dietz questioned whether the Chuba Company would be <br />receiving an advantage over existing businesses. Bill Rubin stated <br />that the Chuba Company is paying a premium for the sites because of the <br />existing structures on the property. He indicated that extraordinary <br />out-of-pocket costs would be needed to remove the building from the <br />property. <br /> <br />Counci1member Dietz also questioned the amount of TIF assistance with <br />this project as compared to the previous project. Bill Rubin indicated <br />that the Chuba Company would be required to document all of the costs <br />associated with the project and therefore would only be reimbursed for <br />actual costs incurred. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Duitsman closed <br />the public hearing. <br /> <br />The City Council discussed approving the modification to TIF Plans No. <br />1 and No.3, but desired to limit Mr. Chuba's request to $50,000. It <br />was the consensus fo the Council to limit the modification to $50,000. <br />The modification to TIF Plans No. 1 and No. 3 will reflect a $50,0000 <br />expenditure. <br />