Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />September 12, 1994 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Consider Resolution Recardinq 1994-95 Public Improvements for Sandpiper <br />Addition <br /> <br />Peter Beck, City Attorney, stated the resolution is intended to set forth the <br />background and findings from the Council's decision at the last meeting, <br />deleting the Sandpiper Estates from the Western Area Phase II project. Peter <br />stated that the purpose of the resolution is to provide a written document for <br />present and future property owners in the Sandpiper Estates. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 94-91, A RESOLUTION <br />AMENDING THE WESTERN AREA PHASE II IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO DELETE THE <br />SANDPIPER ESTATES SUBDIVISION FROM THE PROJECT. COUNCILMEMBER <br />HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHEEL MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED <br />WITH RECORDING OF THE RESOLUTION, TO ENSURE THAT PRESENT AND FUTURE <br />OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN THE SANDPIPER ESTATES SUBDIVISION ARE AWARE OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL'S FINDINGS. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Consider Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Hillside Estates <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, explained that the purpose of the <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet IEAW) is to describe the project and identify <br />potential environmental impacts. He noted that comments from the Department <br />of Natural Resources and the Minnesota Historic Society are included in the <br />Council's packet. He explained that the City Council, as the responsible <br />governmental unit IRGU), must determine whether or not the Hillside <br />Estates/Hillside Crossing project has the potential for significant environmental <br />impact. If the Council finds such a potential, an Environmental Impact <br />Statement lEIS) would be in order. Steve stated that staff is recommending that <br />the City Council approve a resolution declaring that an EIS is not necessary. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 94-92, A <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK RIVER REGARDING THE <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED HILLSIDE ESTATES/HILLSIDE <br />CROSSING PROJECT; RESPONDING TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET; SETTING FORTH THE CITY COUNCIL'S <br />FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />STATEMENT; AND DECLARING THAT THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL <br />IMPACT STATEMENT IS NOT NECESSARY. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />6. Consider Resolution for a Safe and Sober Grant from the State of Minnesota <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 94-93, A RESOLUTION IN <br />SUPPORT OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE SAFE AND SOBER NATIONAL TRAFFIC <br />SAFETY CAMPAIGN. COUNCILMEMBER SCHEEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />e <br />