Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />October 2, 2017 <br />Page 4 <br />Bob Gretton, 14160 227`s Ave NW and the applicant, indicated he learned about the <br />proposed trail easement two weeks ago and would like the trail located on the west <br />side of Meadowvale Road due to wetlands in the southwest comer of the easement <br />and an existing barn situated near the eastern edge of the property. <br />Chairman Anderson indicated in his experience and service, not once have they <br />regretted making a decision to plan for a trail. He stated one cannot foresee when a <br />trail will be built but the commission is asking for 33' dedicated road right-of-way for <br />the protection of Meadowvale Road. He stated in support of the connections of <br />corridor and paths, he asked that the council consider the commission's <br />recommendation for a trail easement in addition to the 33' road right-of-way on the <br />east side, which he believes will match the plan that the council ultimately sees and <br />has directed for future trails as not being side -specific and therefore avoiding <br />surprises such as this applicant experienced. <br />There being no one further to speak, Mayor Dietz closed the public hearing. <br />Mayor Dietz asked why the applicant wasn't informed of the trail recommendation <br />on the east side of Meadowvale Road if the Planning and Parks and Recreation <br />commissions both reviewed this. <br />Mr. Leeseberg indicated this item was reviewed and the trail easement wasn't <br />proposed for the applicant's property until after this application had been reviewed <br />at the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. He indicated the applicant didn't <br />feel he needed to attend the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting because staff <br />made their recommendation based on past council decisions and he didn't think <br />those recommendations would affect his property. <br />Councihnember Wagner stated this too was difficult for her that the surprise trail <br />easement was proposed when the applicant wasn't expecting anything more than a <br />simple plat, and she felt really badly this happened. She indicated she doesn't want to <br />have future applicants have surprises when submitting their applications. She stated <br />that is why the council decided at a previous meeting a few months ago to be side - <br />specific when planning trails to avoid surprises and gray area. She explained her <br />support in planning for future sidewalks and trails to allow safe passage from point A <br />to point B. She was surprised that this trail easement wasn't included as a condition. <br />Mayor Dietz agreed with Councilmember Wagner's thoughts and felt it should also <br />be a condition. He stated the applicant should be made aware of the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission's recommendations the next day after their meeting. He <br />suggested altering staff's process to notify the applicant in advance of the council <br />meeting. He also stated the Parks and Recreation Commission has every right to <br />make recommendations based upon the soon to be updated trail map, which is a <br />work in progress until finalized. <br />IAAEAEI Ar <br />NATUR� <br />