My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.7. - 6.9. SR 09-20-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
09/20/1999
>
6.7. - 6.9. SR 09-20-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:23 AM
Creation date
3/7/2005 3:58:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/20/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Scott Harlicker <br />September 15, 1999 <br />Page Three <br /> <br />+ The developers should verify whether or not a Corp of Engineers permit is necessary for any <br />of the wetland issues on the project. <br /> <br />C. Septic System Analysis <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />+ City staff asked the developers to perform soil borings on selected lots to determine the <br />suitability of the lots for septic systems. Ten lots were selected for this analysis. The <br />developers hired Eco-Systems Engineers, Inc. of Elk River to perform this analysis. They <br />performed soil borings on these 10 lots on September 1, 1999 and provided a written report <br />summarizing the borings on September 2, 1999. The report indicates that 5 of the lots <br />tested would require mound septic systems because of the seasonally high water table <br />found on these lots. The report goes on to estimate that the area required for a mound <br />drain field is approximately 3400 square feet. Therefore a primary and secondary location <br />would require a total of 6800 square feet. There are several lots where it is questionable <br />whether or not adequate space could be provided for the primary and secondary septic <br />location assuming a mound system. We did a cursor review of the grading plan relative to <br />this information and believe that it would be difficult to build two mound systems on Lot 8, <br />Block 1 and also potentially on Lot 4, Block 3. Lot 7, Block 1 may also be difficult given the <br />topography of the area available for septic systems proposed. On lots 10 and 11, Block 2 it <br />will be virtually impossible to provide 6800 square feet for septic systems between the <br />easement protecting the wetlands and the grading limits. Given this information, we would <br />recommend that the developer go back and further analyze the lots to determine if there are <br />any other ones requiring mound systems, then reevaluate the lot layout to ensure that the <br />6800 square feet can be provided on each lot requiring a mound system. This work should <br />be done before any final plat is considered and these areas need to be identified and <br />protected before any grading of the site has begun. <br /> <br />+ In lots where it is tight to provide two locations for a septic system the location of wells on <br />the adjacent lots could also be an issue. The setback of a septic system from a deep well is <br />required to be 50-feet. Well locations, where necessary, should be noted on the plans so <br />that a well is not placed in a location which impacts the septic systems on an adjacent lot. <br /> <br />D. Storm Drain Calculations <br /> <br />+ There are a number of storm sewer runs on the project which exceed the 1 a-feet per second <br />maximum velocity. These would include: <br />1. CB 9 to CB 8 <br />2. CB 8 to OL 1 <br />3. CB 7 to OL 6 <br />4. CB 25 to OL 26 <br />These runs of storm sewer should be reevaluated to determine if the maximum velocity can <br />be lowered to below 1 a-feet per second. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />O:\PROJ\807640j\0240\640'1501.S~ward R. Green Company <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.