My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. EDSR 04-25-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Joint Finance Committee
>
Packets
>
2017
>
04-25-2017
>
4.1. EDSR 04-25-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2017 2:21:19 PM
Creation date
7/25/2017 2:21:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
4/25/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Elk River, Minnesota <br /> Tax Increment Applications for Proposed Jackson Hill Residential Suites Housing Project and <br /> Elk River Lodge and Residential Suites, LLC <br /> April 25,2017 <br /> Page 8 <br /> (i) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons; <br /> (ii)are located adjacent to rail facilities; and <br /> (iii) have been removed or are unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used; or <br /> (4)a qualifying disaster area,as defined in subdivision 10b. <br /> For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a <br /> combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate <br /> egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total <br /> significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. <br /> A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or <br /> could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new <br /> structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified <br /> as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the <br /> size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar <br /> reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without an interior inspection of the property, <br /> but need not have an independent, expert appraisal prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. <br /> An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is <br /> unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or <br /> controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is <br /> structurally substandard. Items of evidence that support such a conclusion include recent fire or police inspections, <br /> on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable <br /> evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be <br /> made and retained. Failure of a building to be disqualified under the provisions of this paragraph is a necessary, but <br /> not a sufficient, condition to determining that the building is substandard. <br /> A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building for purposes of the finding under paragraph <br /> (a)or by the improvements described in paragraph(e)if all of the following conditions are met: <br /> (1)the parcel was occupied by a substandard building or met the requirements of paragraph(e), as the case may be, <br /> within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district with the county auditor; <br /> (2) the substandard building or the improvements described in paragraph (e) were demolished or removed by the <br /> authority or the demolition or removal was financed by the authority or was done by a developer under a <br /> development agreement with the authority; <br /> (3) the authority found by resolution before the demolition or removal that the parcel was occupied by a structurally <br /> substandard building or met the requirements of paragraph (e) and that after demolition and clearance the authority <br /> intended to include the parcel within a district; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.