My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1. SR 06-19-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2017
>
06-19-2017
>
8.1. SR 06-19-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2018 2:37:34 PM
Creation date
6/15/2017 3:12:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/19/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LHB counts energy code deficiencies toward the 15 percent code threshold required by <br /> Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c)) for the following reasons: <br /> • The Minnesota energy code is one of ten building code areas highlighted by the <br /> Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry website where minimum <br /> construction standards are required by law. <br /> • Chapter 13 of the 2015 Minnesota Building Code states, `Buildings shall be designed <br /> and constructed in accordance with the International Energy Conservation Code." <br /> Furthermore, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1305.0021 Subpart 9 states, "References <br /> to the International Energy Conservation Code in this code mean the Minnesota Energy <br /> Code..." <br /> • Chapter 11 of the 2015 Minnesota Residential Code incorporates Minnesota Rules, <br /> Chapters, 1322 and 1323 Minnesota Energy Code. <br /> • The Senior Building Code Representative for the Construction Codes and <br /> Licensing Division of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry <br /> confirmed that the Minnesota Energy Code is being enforced throughout the State <br /> of Minnesota. <br /> • In a January 2002 report to the Minnesota Legislature, the Management Analysis <br /> Division of the Minnesota Department of Administration confirmed that the <br /> construction cost of new buildings complying with the Minnesota Energy Code is <br /> higher than buildings built prior to the enactment of the code. <br /> • Proper TIF analysis requires a comparison between the replacement value of a <br /> new building built under current code standards with the repairs that would be <br /> necessary to bring the existing building up to current code standards. In order for <br /> an equal comparison to be made,all applicable code chapters should be applied to <br /> both scenarios. Since current construction estimating software automatically <br /> applies the construction cost of complying with the Minnesota Energy Code, <br /> energy code deficiencies should also be identified in the existing structures. <br /> C. DISTRIBUTION OF SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS <br /> Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10,defines a Redevelopment District and requires <br /> one or more of the following conditions, "reasonably distributed throughout the district." <br /> (1) "Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, <br /> streets,utilities,paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than <br /> 50 percent of the buildings,not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a <br /> degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; <br /> (2) the property consists of vacant,unused,underused,inappropriately used, or infrequently <br /> used rail yards,rail storage facilities, or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way; <br /> (3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities..." <br /> Our interpretation of the distribution requirement is that the substandard buildings must be <br /> reasonably distributed throughout the district as compared to the location of all buildings in <br /> the district. For example,if all of the buildings in a district are located on one half of the <br /> area of the district,with the other half occupied by parking lots (meeting the required 70 <br /> percent coverage for the district),we would evaluate the distribution of the substandard <br /> Beaudry Redevelopment TIF District#24 <br /> LHB Project No. 170323 Page 5 of 12 Final Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.