My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.3. SR 04-19-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
04/19/1999
>
4.3. SR 04-19-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:15 AM
Creation date
2/24/2005 3:22:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/19/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Grade Crossings <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Overview <br /> <br />An in-depth grade crossing analysis will be prepared for each crossing during the preparation of the <br />EIS for the Northstar commuter rail system. However, it is important to note in this document the <br />safety and mobility considerations that will be investigated as part of the EIS process. <br /> <br />Within the study area of the Northstar corridor, there are numerous highway crossings of the <br />Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail tracks. The Northstar commuter rail system will add the <br />following number of trains to the BNSF rail tracks by the Year 2003. <br /> <br />· 10 trains per day between Elk River and Saint Cloud <br />· 14 trains per day between Ramsey and Elk River <br />· 18 trains per day between downtown Minneapolis and Ramsey <br /> <br />Overall, at-grade highway crossings of rail facilities known as grade crossings are subject to <br />operational concerns with respect to interference between roadway and rail traffic. These concerns <br />include: <br /> <br />· Delay impacts to vehicular traffic due to activation of railroad warning systems and occupancy of <br />the grade crossing by trains <br />. Secondary traffic operational impacts such as disruption of traffic signals by rail preemption <br />. Safety concerns either due to violation of traffic control devices or by queuing of highway <br />vehicles in the grade crossing area <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Additionally, although the rail mode has the right-of-way at grade crossings, to the extent that traffic <br />operational problems develop, train speeds may be affected. In addition, strategies utilized to manage <br />conflicts and improve safety at rail grade crossings may impart small but measurable delays to the rail <br />operations plan. <br /> <br />For these reasons, careful consideration should be given to the design issues including the physical <br />configuration of the grade crossing as well as traffic and train control equipment and operational <br />strategies. An integrated approach which includes a combination of warning and control will provide <br />the best solution. The best solution is one which maximizes safety while balancing delay and <br />operational impacts. <br /> <br />Safety Considerations at Grade Crossings <br /> <br />The principal traffic safety consideration at a grade crossing is to avoid collisions between trains and <br />highway vehicles. An additional consideration is limiting secondary accidents which may involve only <br />the roadway vehicular mode as a result of train activity or activation of the grade crossing warning <br />system (similar to the concern with rear end type accidents which occur at red traffic signals). <br /> <br />The primary safety concern is met if clear warning and positive traffic control is provided and if <br />drivers do not violate the established safety devices. Safety is enhanced if sight distance is available to <br />roadway vehicles and train operators approaching the crossing. Where sight distance is limited, grade <br />crossing warning and protective systems which typically include flashing lights, audible devices and <br />automatic gates are essential to maintain safety. Setting aside the issues related to violations and <br /> <br />Commuter Rail Feasibility Study <br />March 24, 1999 <br /> <br />8-8 <br />Social and Environmental Impacts <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.