Laserfiche WebLink
taxable bonds,the spread is closer to 180 basis points.The • Replacing the exclusion for municipal bonds with a direct <br /> difference can save municipal bond issuers 25 percent over the payment bond would increase borrowing costs by 16 percent <br /> 30-year life of a project.These savings result in more critical (assuming a direct payment percentage of 25 percent of <br /> investments in infrastructure and essential services by state and the issuer's interest expenses).Direct payment bond issuers <br /> local governments and lower costs for the services they provide. would also be vulnerable to the annual budget process,as evi- <br /> Also,municipal bonds are ideally suited to finance capital-inten- dented by the ongoing sequestration order for Build America <br /> sive and long-lived public infrastructure,such as the assets of a Bond payments. (See APPA's fact sheet,"Sequestration for <br /> public power utility. Build America Bonds'Credit Payments"for additional infor- <br /> Investors purchase municipal bonds in part because of tax mation.) <br /> considerations,accepting a lower rate of return because the To put these numbers in perspective,a$250 million power <br /> interest is exempt from federal income tax.Municipal bonds plant would cost$80 million more to finance if the tax exemp- <br /> are also valued for their ability to generate a steady stream of tion for municipal bonds were repealed;$40 million more if the <br /> revenue for fixed-income households.Individual households tax exemption were"capped"and$30 million more if municipal <br /> are the investors in over 70 percent of municipal bonds.Nearly bonds were replaced with direct payment bonds. <br /> 60 percent of this household tax-exempt interest is earned by <br /> taxpayers over 65 years old.In 2012,48 percent of all municipal <br /> bond interest paid to individuals went to those with incomes of <br /> less than$250,000.2 American Public Power Association Position <br /> The Association believes municipal bonds are the single most <br /> Recent market performance and the"flight to quality" un- <br /> derscore that municipal bonds are also valued as stable financial effective tool for financing investments in public infrastruc- <br /> investments.Now more than 200-years old,the U.S.municipal ture.Taxing municipal bonds would impose higher borrowing <br /> costs that would limit investment in critical infrastructure and, <br /> bond market is well-established,with a robust and compre- <br /> hensive federal legislative and regulatory system that protects ultimately,impose higher electric rates on our residential and <br /> investors.Likewise,municipal bonds themselves are typically business customers. In sum,any such change would simply <br /> extremely secure investment vehicles:the default rate for invest- shift costs from the federal government onto the backs of state <br /> and local residents.As a result,the Association believes that the <br /> ment grade municipal bonds is far less than 0.1 percent,a frac <br /> federal tax exclusion for municipal bond interest should not be <br /> tion of the default rate for comparably rated corporate bonds. <br /> limited or replaced. <br /> Congressional and Administration Actions— American Public Power Association Contact <br /> Threats to Municipal Bonds <br /> Calls to tax municipal bonds to pay for federal income tax rate John Godfrey,Senior Government Relations Director, <br /> cuts or deficit reduction are on the rise.All would have the 202-467-2929/jgodfrey@publicpower.org <br /> same effect:limiting or eliminating the income tax exemption <br /> for interest from municipal bonds would reduce investments in <br /> vital infrastructure across the country and increase the cost of The American Public Power Association is the voice of <br /> electricity for public power customers.Ultimately,a dispropor- not-for-profit,community-owned utilities that power <br /> tionate share of this burden will be shouldered by those who can 2,000 towns and cities nationwide.We represent pub- <br /> least afford it. lit power before the federal government to protect the <br /> For example: interests of the more than 49 million people that public <br /> • A repeal of the tax exemption for municipal bonds would power utilities serve,and the 93,000 people they em- <br /> increase borrowing costs by 47 percent; ploy. Our association advocates and advises on electricity <br /> policy,technology,trends,training,and operations.Our <br /> • A surtax on municipal bond interest to create a"cap"on the members strengthen their communities by providing <br /> tax value of the exclusion for municipal bonds would increase superior service,engaging citizens,and instilling pride in <br /> borrowing costs by 32 to 35 percent;and communityowned power. <br /> z Internal Revenue Service,"Statistics of Income-2010:Individual Income Tax <br /> Returns"(2012). <br /> 62 PublicPower.org <br /> 244 <br />