|
AMERICAN
<br /> PUBLiC
<br /> powirP
<br /> I ��TM
<br /> ASSOCIATION
<br /> Powering Strong Communities
<br /> ISSUE BRIEF January 2017
<br /> Municipal Bonds and Public Power
<br /> Summary requiring issuers to register bonds for the interest to be exempt
<br /> Tax-exempt municipal bonds have financed$2 trillion in new from tax—and to tax the interest on bonds determined not to
<br /> be for governmental purposes. By way of example of the latter,
<br /> investments in infrastructure in the last decade,including
<br /> $112 billion in new investments in electric power generation, the 1986 Tax Reform Act substantially revised the tax treatment
<br /> transmission and distribution,and should be the cornerstone of private activity bonds.'In 1988,a slim U.S. Supreme Court
<br /> of any plan to address the significant challenges of funding and majority in South Carolina v.Baker found that municipal bonds
<br /> financing new investments in public infrastructure.Federal tax could be taxed,but Congress has been unwilling to overturn
<br /> exemption reduces costs at the margin,but municipal bonds are decades of precedent by changing the tax treatment of govern-
<br /> subject to local control and responsibility.Therefore,the Amer- ment purpose bonds.
<br /> ican Public Power Association(Association or APPA) opposes
<br /> any efforts to limit or eliminate municipal bonds given these
<br /> adverse impacts on our public power utility members and their Strengths and Benefits of Municipal Bonds
<br /> customers. State and local governmental entities—including public power
<br /> utilities—have limited means to raise funds for their commu-
<br /> nities'capital needs.The municipal bond market gives close to
<br /> Background and History 42,000 governmental issuers access to investors.This is partic-
<br /> The first recorded municipal bond was issued in 1812.Today, ularly important to the vast majority of small towns,counties,
<br /> there are$3.7 trillion in municipal bonds outstanding,with cities,and publicly owned utilities that issue municipal bonds.
<br /> more than$200 billion funding new projects every year.Close The median corporate bond issue is$210 million. Conversely,
<br /> to five percent of those issuances(as much as$11 billion every while roughly five percent of municipal bond issuances are for
<br /> year) finance new investments in power generation,distribution, $200 million or more,the vast majority of municipal bonds,
<br /> reliability,demand control,efficiency,and emissions control:all including for public power investments,are far smaller: the
<br /> needed to deliver safe,affordable,and reliable electricity, median municipal bond issuance is$7 million.
<br /> In addition to infrastructure for public power utilities,these The federal tax exclusion of bond interest means issuers can
<br /> bonds finance roads,bridges,sewers,hospitals,libraries,schools, finance their investments affordably. Over the past 20 years,the
<br /> town halls,police stations,and every other sort of govern- average yield of Standard&Poor's Corporate Bond(Aaa) Index
<br /> ment-purpose investment made by state and local governments. has been 130 basis points higher than that of Moody's High-
<br /> In fact,nearly three-quarters of the infrastructure investment in Grade Municipal Bond Index.Adjusting for the cost of call
<br /> provisions common in municipal bonds,but rare in corporate
<br /> the U.S.is financed by state and local government bonds.
<br /> Since the creation of the federal income tax in 1913,interest
<br /> on government purpose municipal bonds has been excluded 'Private activity bonds differ from government purpose municipal bonds in
<br /> from federal income tax.This dates back to a series of U.S. that they can be issued by a state or local government to finance certain private
<br /> Supreme Court decisions in the 1800s concluding first,that a projects.Interest on qualifying private activity bonds is exempt from regular
<br /> federal income tax,but subject to the federal Alternative Minimum Tax(AMT).
<br /> state tax on a federal enterprise inherently violated the Constitu
<br /> The volume of private activity bonds that can be issued in a state is subject to an
<br /> tion and,second,that a federal tax on municipal bond interest annual cap.While power generation and distribution are among the qualified
<br /> likewise would be unconstitutional.Subsequently,the U.S. private activity bond activities,other restrictions and considerations make
<br /> Supreme Court has given the federal government the right to the use of tax-exempt private activity bonds rare for such purposes.Of 1,150
<br /> municipal bonds issued for public power projects from 2007-2011,just 30 were
<br /> regulate government purpose municipal bonds—for example, private activity bonds.
<br /> PublicPower.org 6s
<br /> 243
<br />
|