My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.4. SR 03-15-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
03/15/1999
>
4.4. SR 03-15-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:13 AM
Creation date
2/15/2005 3:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/15/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />lakes, rivers or creeks in the vicinity; no commercial or retail uses to displace). Therefore, . <br />this potential interchange location is considered feasible. <br /> <br />4.7 CONSTRUCTION OF BYPASS <br /> <br />Alternative bypass alignments are presented in Figure VI-2, Figure VI-3 and Figure VI-4. <br /> <br />Safety and Mobility Benefits <br /> <br />By separating through-traffic from turning traffic, a higher level of mobility is provided <br />because of fewer interruptions to traffic flow. Increased safety is also achieved because of <br />a significant decrease in the number of conflicts between turning vehicles and through <br />vehicles. Therefore, this alternative would provide significant and mobility benefits. <br /> <br />Environmental Impacts <br /> <br />Figure VI-2 through Figure VI-4 present the proposed bypass locations. In general, the <br />bypass alternative has significant environmental impacts. <br /> <br />. AnokaJRamsey - Dense development in this area precluded consideration of a bypass. <br /> <br />. Elk River - The Elk River bypass would require two Mississippi River crossings and <br />additional right-of-way in Wright County (Figure VI-2). Existing development, the <br />Elk River, wetlands and the BNSF railroad preclude the potential for the bypass within <br />Elk River. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />. Big Lake - There were two potential bypass alignments in Big Lake (Figure VI-3). <br />The northern alignment east of CSAH 5 in Sherburne County would require right-of- <br />way in an area, as identified by the City, with significant future residential development <br />potential and wetlands. It would also entail Elk River crossings. These were <br />significant environmental impacts. The southern alignment does not have significant <br />impacts on the Elk River, wetlands and future development. It also provided continuity <br />to the Elk River bypass. Therefore, for the purpose of estimating construction costs, <br />this alignment is the preferred bypass alignment for the area. <br /> <br />. Becker - Similarly, there were two potential bypass alignments in Becker (Figure VI- <br />3). The northern alignment would require right-of-way from an existing golf course <br />and an area, as identified by the City, with future potential for residential development. <br />It also had significant wetland impacts due to its proximity to the Elk River. The <br />southern alignment would require right-of-way from existing agricultural land. <br />Therefore, for the purpose of estimating construction costs, this alignment was the <br />preferred bypass alignment for the area. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study <br />Conceptual Definition of Alternatives <br />February 1999 <br /> <br />VI-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.