My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.4. SR 03-15-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
03/15/1999
>
4.4. SR 03-15-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:13 AM
Creation date
2/15/2005 3:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/15/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Environmental Impacts <br /> <br />The qualitative environmental and socioeconomic impacts of this alternative are described <br />by corridor segment. In urban areas, expansion would have to occur on existing right-of- <br />way because of physical constraints that include existing and future development, close <br />proximity to the rivers, wetlands and recreational areas, and the BNSF railroad. However, <br />in rural areas, much of the roadway is bordered by agricultural land that could be used for <br />expansion of travel lanes. In summary, depending on the location of the roadway <br />improvement the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of this option were <br />significantly adverse but do not necessarily preclude its feasibility. <br /> <br />Cost <br /> <br />Construction cost was estimated at $2 million per lane mile for a new four-lane divided <br />roadway. Right-of-way costs, depending on the location of the roadway improvement, <br />would have adverse effects on the feasibility of this alternative. Therefore, depending on <br />the location, this option may be considered infeasible. <br /> <br />4.6 CONSTRUCTION OF INTERCHANGES AT KEY LOCATIONS <br /> <br />Safety and Mobility Benefits <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />An interchange is a form of access control. A facility with such access control provides a <br />higher level of safety and mobility than one without (Figure VI-2). <br /> <br />Environmental Impacts <br /> <br />The construction of an interchange requires a significant amount of right-of-way. In many <br />of the potential interchange locations identified, significant physical constraints exist such <br />as wetlands, rivers, railroad and development. Depending on the location of the <br />interchange, the construction would have have highly adverse impacts on the natural <br />environment and would disrupt and/or displace businesses and neighborhoods along the <br />corridor. Therefore, depending on the location, this alternative could have adverse <br />impacts on the environment. <br /> <br />Cost <br /> <br />Depending on the location of the improvement, the large amount of right-of-way required <br />by this option entails right-of-way costs that are equally significant. Cost of interchange <br />construction is estimated at $5 million each including bridge, ramps and roadways. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />At this screening level, it should be noted that of the potential interchange locations <br />identified (except in St. Cloud), CSAH 11 in Becker Township has relatively the lowest <br />right-of-way cost requirements. The area is currently zoned agricultural (no wetlands, <br /> <br />Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study <br />Conceptual Definition of Alternatives <br />February 1999 <br /> <br />VI-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.