6.1. & 6.2. SR 03-08-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . (Continued, pg. 2 - Febru8ry, '99 (Kathy Swanberg) - P98-8 &CU9826) Bill & I held-out signing this petition, as we gently but firmly kept asking dad why this petition involved us, which FINALLY FORCED dad to admit he inclur'led our land in this development project in option & purchase agreements. Later we discovered these agreements were DESIGNED & EXECUTED to include thA signatures of ONLY my parents & this association of de- veloners & all of which were TOTALLY UNBEKN01iIfN to Bill & I from Jan. of '94 all thro into '98: Dad's ovm acres total up to 62.40 acres, therefore, as you C8n see (in Exhibits A thro &) that dad & this ~ssoci~tion TOOK CONTROL of our nropertv from '94 all the way into '98. Starting with the 1st 5t acre parcel & then the other 5t acre parcel for a total of 11 plus acres. withOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE: All along they MISLEAD the city saying that we landowners have been UNWILLING to sell, etc. & asking for an UNREASONABLE price, etc. I beg to differ: JUST HOW cnuld we have been illiWILLING & UNREASON- ABLE when we did NOT EVEN KNOW they had ALL our land included in this development?:?: Matt Fischer never approached us with any purchase offer or any round table discussions, problem solving or anything. Yet, he & dad wanted us to sign the petition so they could PROCEED with their project. Or was it meant to PREVENT L-I-A-B-I-L-I-T-Y ?:?: So, what gives them the right to +'hreaten to D-E-V-A-L-U-E our land into being landlocked, useless & worthless?:?: - JUST BECAUSE they did NOT get away with ABDUCTING BOTH our land parcels?:?: I am QUITE SUSPICIOUS of their REASONING for this so-called 'PRI- VATE' road in this plan, because how better to fulfill their threats to DEVALUE our land, FOR they do NOT know how to NEGOTIATE, ETC. & ~OE: to those who g~t in their way:: Upon Tony Gleekel's REQUEST of the city to CONSIDER putting Mevis- sen's & WardAn's land parcels into the powere of eminent domain process, the consensus of the EDA on Nov. 9, '98 was that IF these nroperty ovmers were UNWILLING to sell or IF they were holding-out for an UNREASONABLE price that thAv would be in favor of going thro the power of eminent domain process to ACQUIRE SUCH PROPERTY: - and of which process the city did st~rt later. Which is why we landowners approached the city at several meetings, so we could help problem-solve, because Tony Gleekel has been mis- leading everyone all along: Quite the contrary, Mr. Gleekel: You & dad are the ones who are UNWILLING & UNREASONABLE, to say the least: (Pg. 2 & continue to pg. 3)