Laserfiche WebLink
The LEC is currently working on the 2025 Minne- continuing conservation improvements throughout <br /> sota Energy Planning Project. This process started the state. DER agreed that it was time for a new <br /> in July 2015. The LEC Taskforce finished designing study since the last study was over five years old. <br /> its Action Plan in late summer of 2016 to identify A Request for Proposals to conduct the study was <br /> key areas to drive the state forward toward a 2025 issued by DER with the study to commence in 2017. <br /> energy future. The areas of discussion were Trans- <br /> portation; Electricity Supply and Grid Modern- Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) <br /> ization; Efficient Buildings and Thermal Energy; study groups <br /> Industry and Agriculture; and Local Planning. MMUA participated in study groups on Smart Grid <br /> The group and its stakeholder committee held two Technologies, cyber security, advancing solar op- <br /> meetings in 2016. portunities and development of possible changes to <br /> the state's distributed generation interconnection <br /> e21 Initiative standard. <br /> The e21 Initiative, convened by the Great Plains <br /> Institute and the Center for Energy and Environ- Clean Power Plan (EPA) <br /> ment, "aims to develop a more customer-centric MMUA met with the MPCA and a stakeholder <br /> and sustainable framework for utility regulation, group throughout the year to discuss compliance <br /> that better aligns how utilities earn revenue with with the proposed Clean Power Plan issued in <br /> public policy goals, new customer expectations, and 2014. The Final Rule was released by the EPA in <br /> the changing technology landscape." The initiative 2015 with the CPP publication in the Federal Reg- <br /> brings together a wide variety of interests to accom- ister in October of that year. MMUA was an active <br /> plish the above-stated goal and"enable Minnesota participant in the stakeholder process to define and <br /> to continue to lead in shaping an electric system guide the State Plan. <br /> for the 21st century." Phase II started in January <br /> of 2015, with meetings occurring monthly or more Along with the MPCA Stakeholder group, many <br /> often in 2016. No consensus on reaching goals was sub-group meetings were held to help guide the <br /> reached by November and the report was delayed larger stakeholder process. MMUA was active with <br /> for re-writes. multiple groups as the details of the rule were be- <br /> ing developed. With the outcome of the November <br /> Minnesota Division of Energy Resources (DER): election, the future of the CPP is in doubt. <br /> Workshops were held and are continuing on multi- <br /> ple aspects of regulatory policy guidance including: Other efforts <br /> Jagusch presented to the Midwest Governors As- <br /> •Conservation Improvement Program (CIP) im- sociation on the Research and Development efforts <br /> provements for public power utilities with stake- of the public power community. <br /> holders from the Minnesota Legislature, DER, <br /> The Center for Energy and the Environment (CEE) Jagusch continued as a member of the American <br /> and the University of Minnesota Clean Energy Re- Public Power Association's Demonstration of En- <br /> source Teams (CERTs). This process was a continu- ergy and Efficiency Developments (DEED) Board <br /> ing discussion from Legislation proposed by MMUA of Directors and is public power's representative on <br /> in 2015. Though no formal changes have been made the National Energy Efficiency Registry, which is <br /> to the rule, the process has allowed a free flow of developing a national trade desk for energy efficien- <br /> ideas among the stakeholders. cy credits. Jagusch also served as a member of the <br /> Minnesota Energy Storage Alliance and the Divi- <br /> •Combined Heat and Power (CHP). This is another sion of Energy Resources CIP Advisory Group. He <br /> multi-year stakeholder group that is struggling also worked with the National Renewable Energy <br /> with the development of standby charges for CHP Laboratory (NREL), to develop a cyber security <br /> projects. The group is working through the multiple framework for small public power utilities. <br /> proposed standby tariff formulas that the IOUs and <br /> Dakota Electric have proposed. This process will Jagusch also served as staff support for the Solar <br /> continue in 2017. Distributed Generation Task Force, the Minnesota <br /> Municipal Gas Association (an MMUA sister orga- <br /> •Conservation Potential Study. This was a proposal nization) and also for the Midwest Consortium of <br /> from MMUA and MREA to study the potential for Municipal Utilities, MMUA's financing arm. <br /> 10-2016 Year in Review <br /> 149 <br />