Laserfiche WebLink
threat information, all new language developed in <br /> consort with the electricity industry. During the <br /> August recess public power provided the industry <br /> witness to a field hearing on captive rail issues— <br /> Tom Heller from MRES. The hearing in Sioux Falls <br /> also featured all three STB commissioners who are <br /> working to resolve several issues for rail customers. <br /> By the time September rolled around it seemed ' 100110111'4"` <br /> Congress had little fight left, let alone the energy to <br /> pass anything beyond the required continuing reso- <br /> lution budget package. Several controversial items -= .�'�•. 1111 <br /> remained unresolved, including the water crisis in MMUA Washington Representative Michael Nolan made <br /> Flint, relief for recent flood victims, new financial a popular summer conference presentation. <br /> assistance for massive forest fires, and drought <br /> relief for Western states. There was also the House- legislation, something that had a chance of passing, <br /> Senate energy conference, plus coal ash and tax, chances of victory increase. But time was run- <br /> with very little time left before Congress broke for ning out, and legislative options were limited. One <br /> the October campaign season. They wouldn't return last shot came with a major water bill—the Water <br /> until after Election Day. Resources Development Act, or WRDA. This is al- <br /> ways bipartisan legislation since it has such broad <br /> As the energy conference got underway, public authority over federal spending for infrastructure <br /> power's priorities developed at the same time: sup- projects; the bill also was becoming a magnet for <br /> port energy efficiency provisions; support hydro last minute "must pass" items, including drought <br /> relicensing reform; support the bulk power systems and flood relief, and federal assistance for Flint. <br /> reliability impact statement; and support vegeta- <br /> tion management language involving federal lands. The WRDA bill comes through the Senate Environ- <br /> But we also needed to oppose several sticky wick- ment and Public Works Committee, which had just <br /> ets, including: oppose new FERC development of developed new bipartisan language on coal ash, <br /> electromagnetic pulse (EMP) regulations; oppose all language now supported by EPA. The provision <br /> PURPA-related items, including a House-adopted would allow for state permitting programs to either <br /> amendment on net metering interconnection stan- implement the final EPA coal ash regulations, <br /> dards for solar; and oppose language that would or operate a separate state program. The Senate <br /> direct DOE to develop model guidance for intercon- went first—it easily passed a new WRDA bill, now <br /> nection of combined heat-and-power systems. Some dubbed the WIIN Act—Water Infrastructure for <br /> of these came to pass during conference delibera- the Improvements of the Nation Act—and included <br /> tions—the EMP language was dropped, so was the the coal ash language. The House passed their own <br /> solar amendment—but the conferees ran out of bill, but without coal ash.A struggle ensued during <br /> time as the lame duck session came to an end. conference deliberations but the total package was <br /> agreed to just before Congress went home. With a <br /> But not before coal ash had one last chance. A new continuing resolution spending bill done, the <br /> stand-alone coal ash bill would never make it, but if 114th Congress ended, leaving a host of issues for <br /> the provision could be attached to a larger piece of the new 115th <br /> Engineering and Policy Analysis <br /> MMUA Director of Engineering and Policy Analysis ates the energy policies of the state, assessing the <br /> Bob Jagusch was kept extremely busy in 2016 with impact on the future of the environment and the <br /> many long-term policy and regulatory proceedings, economy. The commission also monitors the state's <br /> which were actively meeting—until the November progress in achieving goals to develop renewable <br /> election. These activities included: sources of electric energy; evaluates progress in <br /> reducing greenhouse gas emissions; reviews and <br /> Legislative Energy Commission recommends proposed energy legislation and takes <br /> The Legislative Energy Commission (LEC) evalu- public testimony on energy issues. <br /> 2016 Year in Review-9 <br /> 148 <br />