My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-1999 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
01-19-1999 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:08 AM
Creation date
2/2/2005 3:39:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
1/19/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Minutes <br />January 19, 1999 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Quinn. He further stated that he has given up three already sold acres in the <br />process, and that he felt that waiving the park dedication fee would be a fair <br />trade. <br /> <br />Paul Hipsag, 2272 Quinn Street, questioned why, after four surveys, there is still <br />doubt as to where Quinn Street is located. He also questioned what the zoned <br />usage for Lot A would be. <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Mayor Klinzing closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Richard Bury stated that there is no question about the location of Quinn Street, <br />and, as indicated in a letter from Terry Maurer, it has never changed. He further <br />stated that Lot A is zoned agricultural, and that it is not anticipated that it will ever <br />change. <br /> <br />Council member Dietz stated that he would not be willing to set a precedent by <br />waiving the park dedication fee. <br /> <br />Mr. Bury stated that although he gained land on parcel A, it is not as valuable as <br />the 2,900 square feet he lost on parcel B. He reiterated that the land he lost had <br />already been sold for a very good price. <br /> <br />Council member Thompson questioned if it was probable that the Tiller <br />Corporation may mine or sell their land for another use. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Attorney Peter Beck indicated that substantial setback requirements provide <br />the city with immunities, and that it was not probable that the Tiller Corporation <br />would be an issue. He further indicated that it would require certain procedures <br />to dispose of trail property that was purchased by the city. <br /> <br />Council member Farber inquired if, from a legal stand point, it would set a <br />precedent if the park dedication was to be waived. <br /> <br />City Attorney Peter Beck stated that it would not necessarily be a legal <br />precedent, but more a practical precedent - which is not uncommon in unique <br />circumstances such as this one. He continued stating that the reason this is not a <br />common issue is that: (A) the owner did lose some land, and (B) the city <br />relocated 22151 Avenue, creating Parcel C. He stated that although the <br />relocation was done in cooperation with the owner, it has resulted in a net loss for <br />him. <br /> <br />Mr. Bury informed the council that there is a closing on the property scheduled for <br />February 2, 1999, and that to delay the requested action would result in a <br />tremendous hardship for him. <br /> <br />MAYOR KLINZING MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY RICHARD BURY FOR AN <br />ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVSION TO CREATE TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FROM A 36.19 <br />ACRE LOT, AND TO WAIVE THE PARK DEDICATION FEE (DUE TO THE APPLICANT'S <br />LAND AND FINANCIAL LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRAIL EASEMENT RELOCATION) <br />WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.