Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memo to the Park & Recreation Commission <br />October 6, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Site Description Pros Cons Other <br />Number <br /> 1 Holzem #1 . Site has no . Too far from <br /> (County 12 & trees trunk lines <br /> Fillmore) . Could be part . Too low <br /> of development . Poor soils <br /> dedication <br /> 2 Holzem #2 (1/4 . Higher site . Too far from <br /> mile south of topographically trunk lines <br /> County Road . Site has no . Conflict with <br /> 12, west side of trees County tile <br /> property system <br /> 3 NE Corner . City owned . Would require <br /> Hillside City . Near trunk loss of trees <br /> Park lines (acre or more) <br /> . Easily . Impact to <br /> accessible adjacent <br /> . Shorter tower residences <br /> required . Sloped <br /> 4 NE Corner of . Adjacent to . Requires <br /> Trott Brook open area in purchase of <br /> Park (in park for staging residential lot <br /> development) . Near trunk lines from developer <br /> . Accessible . Impact to trees in <br /> park <br /> . Future impact to <br /> residences <br /> 5 NW Corner of . Adjacent to . Located in park <br /> Trott Brook open area in . Close to park <br /> Park (in park) park for staging facilities <br /> . Buffered from . Higher <br /> residences by probability of <br /> wetland and graffiti <br /> park amenities . In middle of <br /> . Near trunk lines housing <br /> 6 SE Corner of . Not in park . Site too low <br /> Tyler & County . Near trunk lines . Requires <br />- Road 12 acquisition of <br /> residence <br /> <br />While staff originally opposed the location of the tower in Trott Brook Park, there are <br />some merits of the proposal to consider: <br />