My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.4. SR 08-15-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
08-15-2016
>
7.4. SR 08-15-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2016 11:47:22 AM
Creation date
8/12/2016 9:28:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/15/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Applicable Regulation <br /> Approval of a Plat may only be ordered if the following findings have been made, as outlined in Section <br /> 30-375: <br /> (7) The proposed subdivision is consistent)a ith the honing regulations (allicle VI of this chapter) and conforms In <br /> all respects)arith all requirements of this Code, including the honing regulations and this alicle. <br /> The property is zoned PUD and is guided by previously approved River Park plans and <br /> documents. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning regulations outlined in <br /> the city code and approved plans. <br /> (2) The proposed subdivision is consistent)a ith all applicable general and specialised city, county, and regional <br /> plans, including but not limited to, the city's comprehensive development plan. <br /> The proposed subdivision does not conflict with any city, county, or regional plans,including <br /> the Comprehensive Plan. The River Park subdivision was part of an Environmental <br /> Assessment Worksheet (EAW) which included analysis of traffic and other environmental <br /> impacts. The current plans do not conflict with that study. <br /> (3) The physical charactelistics of the site, * eluding but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to <br /> erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding and drainage are suitable for the type and density of development <br /> and uses contemplated. <br /> The site is suitable for the proposed development. The applicant and city staff continue to <br /> work together to finalize grading, erosion control, and drainage plans. <br /> (4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for avater supply, stoma drainage, seavage transpodation, <br /> erosion control and all other selVices,facilities and inaprovenaents othel7vise required in this allicle. <br /> The subdivision will connect to city sewer and water services, the streets will include storm <br /> drains with associated stormwater treatment ponds. <br /> (5) The proposed subdivision )grill not cause substantial environmental damage. <br /> The area was the subject of an EAW and has already been rough graded for the subdivision. <br /> The project will not cause substantial environmental damage. <br /> (6) The proposed subdivision )grill not conflict)arith easements of record or)arith easements established by judgment of <br /> a coud. <br /> The subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. <br /> (7) The proposed subdivision )grill not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of <br /> neighboling land. <br /> The lands to the north, east, and west have already been developed and include Twin Lakes <br /> Road, single-family development as part of River Park Second Addition, and a large lot single <br /> family development. The area south of the plat was included in the Miske Meadows PUD. <br /> (8) The proposed subdivision is not premature.A subdivision is premature if any of the folloaring exists: <br /> a. Lack of adequate stormavater drainage. <br /> b. Lack of adequate roads. <br /> c. Lack of adequate sanitary seaver systems. <br /> d. Lack of adequate off-site public inaprovenaents or suppo� systems. <br /> The above utilities and improvements will be connected or constructed as part of the <br /> development. The area is within the municipal service area and existing facilities can <br /> handle the additional capacity. There is significant concern regarding adequate road <br /> N:ADeportments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\P\P 16-11 River Pork Fourth\new council\7.4 sr Staff Report RP4.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.