My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. SR 12-20-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
12/20/2004
>
6.3. SR 12-20-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:02 AM
Creation date
12/17/2004 10:11:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/20/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />service and capital outlay categories.' Administrative <br />budget amendments must be requested in writing and <br />approved by the City Administrator and Finance <br />Director. <br /> <br />Second, there are two bond funds in which the bonds have been retired and there is a cash balance <br />remaining. The Council may designate these funds for other uses as appropriate. The bond funds <br />and their current cash balances are as follows: <br /> <br />1996B G.O. Improvement Bonds <br />1999B G.O. Refunding Bonds <br />(Refunding of 1994A Bonds) <br /> <br />$ 47,909.15 <br />$430,523.95 <br /> <br />Both of these bonds were for assessable street, storm sewer, water, and sanitary sewer improvement <br />projects. In the past when a balance has remained after payment of bonds, the remaining cash has <br />been placed in a reserve fund. Either the Capital Projects fund or the Street Improvement fund <br />would be appropriate places to transfer the excess funds as both will be used to fund upcoming <br />improvement projects. <br /> <br />Third, the Public Safety building project has now been finalized. As you may recall, the Council did <br />not authorize the completion of the gun range until the project was well underway because of <br />project budget concerns. At the time the Council authorized award of the gnn range, the City <br />Administrator made a recommendation that the additional cost for the gun range should be funded <br />by the Liquor fund. However, that funding recommendation did not become part of the action <br />taken by the Council. Given the current status of the Government Buildings fund and the fact that <br />the Liquor fund is financing the construction of Westbound, it is more appropriate at this time to <br />fund the balance of the Public Safety project, approximately $166,850.00, with the Government <br />Buildings fund instead. This is less than the original estimate of approximately $200,000 of <br />additional funding needed for the gun range. <br /> <br />Fourth, attached is a memo from the City Engineer requesting the purchase of pavement <br />management software and stereo photographs. As the memo states, staff is recommending that the <br />purchase be funded equally by the Street Improvement Reserve and the Surface Water Management <br />funds. <br /> <br />Action Requested <br />The City Council is asked to consider the 2004 budget amendments, the designation of bond funds, <br />the use of the Govetnment Buildings Reserve fund for the balance of the Public Safety project, and <br />the purchase of pavement management software and stereo photographs with funding as stated <br />above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.