3.1 PCSR 05-24-2016 DRAFT MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 April 26,2016 Berton Bongard, 19040 Lincoln Street NW—asked that the Commission reconsider pushing traffic through the Sunset Ridge development, since there were already a lot of accidents at the County Road. Karl Voltzke, 19172 Kennedy Street NW—Asked when the road connections to the development would be made. Mr.Leeseberg explained. Mr.Voltzke asked how the road connections would be made when the applicant does not own the property in the "white area". He also questioned the type of traffic study that was done, and the accuracy of the study. Mr. Leeseberg stated that an Annual Average Daily Traffic study was completed by MnDOT. Alan Roessler, Paxmar—Addressed the conditions recommended by staff as follows: Conditional Use Permit • #3—remove language"and maintain all exterior building coverings." • #4—add"at the curb" after"20 foot driveway widths" and removed language"all parcels below 65 feet wide";add language"for the parcels on the west side of Edison Street." • #7—remove requirement for B618 curbing for lot sizes greater than 70 feet. • #11 —revise to require 2 trees per lot and 3 trees on corner lots. • #12 & #13—insert"or builder" after"to be installed by developer". • #14& #15—remove requirement that homeowners association be required to maintain the trails. • Snowplowing should not be an issue, since the street width is standard. Preliminary Plat • #3—remove "one foot wider than the front and sides of the building and 12" and add"20" after"shall be platted on a parcel" Don Jensen,Paxmar—stated that Paxmar now owns the "white area"(property) shown on the site plan, and they will go through the process of platting the property. He stated that the necessary connections required by staff will be provided. He stated that Paxmar does not need the connection to the west;this is a recommendation by staff. Mr.Jensen stated that they will provide a paved trail connection for residential access to services,as well as use by the general public,but questioned the recommendation for the HOA to maintain it. He stated that the trail to the south recommended by the Parks and Recreation may not be feasible due to the slopes,but that will need to be determined at some point in the future. Mr. Roessler discussed the access to the east, stating that it may not be possible depending upon the paving schedules in October. Mr.Jensen discussed the difference in product lines and impacts on where the driveway openings are located. He did not feel there would be a driveway"creep"issue and explained why.