7.5. SR 05-16-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PAXMAR consequences we believe. We will be using side lot lines as drawn, create a rear line 20' behind the structure to allow for future decks, porches or additions per HOA architectural controls, with no change to the front lot line at the right of way. Extra short property lines create (building and fire code problems and confuse the gas, electric and other telecommunications industry in the front yard. Parcels below 65 feet in width shall be platted on a parcel ~-- f__. __gid_r a__._ a__ c__._. __ a sides _c 4-2- 20 feet from the rear of the building. The remaining land between buildings rears between Edison and Fillmore shall be platted into a single parcel under common ownership of the homeowners association. Page 3. Housing type 3rd paragraph. (Staff HAD not has concerns, and their satisfaction with the clarified rear yard open space plans. >licant addressed to Comment [LC17]: Staff has confirmed with the Building Official there maybe building code issues with the language proposed by staff but those issues are a direct result of the size and density of lots proposed. If the desire is to have association maintained property, the lots may have to get larger with less density. If the lot lines need to adjust, should an updated primary plat be proposed prior to City Council approval in order to ensure all building and fire codes are met? Comment [LC18]: This now creates individual properties that are owned by the homeowner and are maintained by the property owner. It is now no different than a single family residence where there is no association maintained nronerty or structures. Page 4: Parks note: that we will satisfy the value per current ordinance at the time of application. Comment [LC19]: Staff still has concerns. l The parks commission did not state that improvements would not receive credit, only some of the land. Comment [LC2o]:Itwas noted atthe Parks and Any improvements built would receive credit, and if any citizen has fun sliding or hiking a trail or enjoying the wildlife or a view from a portion of this trail corridor, some recognition and funding credit Recreation meeting that the city has not given park dedication for credit for trails in the past. If this needs to be formalized, the council can recommend should be reconsidered at the appropriate time, not withheld by condition. With no facility plan, no that the item be postponed and sent to the Parks and formal decision could have been made. Recreation Commission for further review and recommendation at their May 11, 2016 regular Page 7. #6. We will start plans for the turn lane, Out may not have construction completed before the meeting. first home starts of phase one, and need to clarify the languagel. STRIKE, ^em^ eted "";" the figs Comment [LC21]: Without it, construction age of the ., ..4 traffic will need to go through the existing Our phase one and county turn lane projects have weather deadlines we need to follow and require work to start in the next few months in order to be complete this season. Page 8, CUP #4. Any condition to recommend a traffic study is to City staff, not the developer. An EAW for a development denser than this was done, and all roadway improvements were completed as the City Engineer has noted. No CUP approval link between any new phase and any new developer funded traffic study can be agreed to. Page 10. Final comments. All our proposed homes are single family, and create single family neighborhoods. The project density is less than the original near the school and the existing roads due to the new plan. All the dwelling type shifts are moving some of the density further south in the land plan. This will create a greater use of entrance number two on Cleveland upon full buildout. Respectfully, Donald Jensen Land Development Director 5160 Viking Blvd. NW Anoka, MN (763)753-6176 neighborhood. How will this impact the safety of the residents, students, construction workers, and roadway users? Comment [LC22]: If the phase one project can be completed before the weather event then the turn lane project can happen in the same time frame. Comment [LC23]: The Planning Commission agreed this should be completed/paid for by the City. Staff believes the previous traffic study is still relevant for the current proposal. Please see the City Engineers memo date April 28, 2016 for further information on this. It is important to note Twin Lakes Road is a county roadway and any traffic studies will need to be coordinated at a county level. Comment [LC24]: Why are they referred to as detached townhomes? This reiterates the question of what need is there for a Home Owners Association? Again, if it is the same as a single family home, why is it not adhering to the regulations outlined for single family homes in a RI district?