7.5. SR 05-16-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PAXMARK, All curbs �n the detached product lots shall be barrier type B618 curbing on curves only. Curb cuts will be staked out per the approved development plan, and future changes must be approved by staff. #11. Why is Miske Meadows being asked to plant more than the current neighborhood? 2 trees per front of the lot accomplish the 30' spacing, with corners providing an additional tree along the side lot lines. The 30' spacing does omit the driveway location and is adjusted on the side lot line due to gas electric telephone conflicts typically. Acknowledge the pattern shifts. 11. Identify one shade tree very 3A feet �n the boulevard area on both sides of all public streets and a second tree in the front yard of each home orner lots require an additional tree 40' from the Comment [LC8]: Again, street parking has been and continues to be a significant concern with staff. This recommendation was added to insure adequate distance is consistently provided between all driveways for multiple can to park. Curb cuts. defining where driveways are planned ahead of time, will insure there is adequate distance between all driveways for multiple can to park. This ties in with CUP condition #+4. See CODD Memo dated April 27. 2016 for more information. Comment [LC9]: This was recommended by staff to provide a uniform treescape to help break up the 111 visual monotony of unbroken building facades. Comment [LC10]: It is unclear if the applicant is recommending it from the intersection of the actual street or from the property line. #12, 13 Identify one shade tree every 30 feet on a line generally 20 feet behind all detached townhomes for the association maintained space between Fillmore and Edison Streets, to be installed by the developer builder �nd maintained in perpetuity by the homeowners association. — Comment [LC11]: Staff agrees withthis clarification. #14, 15 Same clarifications. (Public works and the City benefit by trail connections �n both Comment [LC12]: As they do with all public locations. The burden of maintenance is the public's responsibilityl. It is not fair to overweight the sidewalks which are maintained by private property detached townhome owner to maintain trails that have a legitimate public purpose. Both create suitable owners. shortcuts to the school and park and to pond structures for public works which was at the initial request Comment [LC13]: Does that in turn mean every public feature in the development is the public's of engineering. Strike ... maintained by HOA. Taxes paid will provide the maintenance. We will build. responsibility? (i.e. sidewalks, trees, dedicated public green space) City wide, public sidewalks, which the city benefits from, are required to be maintained by 44- Addition of a bituminous trail connecting Johnson Street with Ivanhoe Drive south side of the private property owners. identified stormwater basin and green space, to be constructed by the developer and maintained by the City. L... Comment [LC14]: The Planning Commission did not recommend this change. 15. Addition of a bituminous trail connecting Fillmore and Edison Streets within the identified access easement and generally north of the detached townhome lots, to be constructed by the developer and maintained by the City. Comment [LC15]: The Planning Commission did not recommend this change. Page 2. Second set of conditions. Approval of Preliminary Plat Regarding condition 2, grading permit and work can occur in all areas not creating a wetland fill if a permit were not in hand, change wording to no fill of wetlands before wetland fill permit. All other work after the specific grading permit is both normal and practical. All required wetland atia aa ra permits must be obtained prior to commencing wetland fill work on the site. Grading permits required as allowed upon engineer's approval of plan areas. #3, see our sketch for how the home and lot will be platted. The staff described dimensions create unnecessary hardship and construction expenses for no greater appraisal value, and are unintended 5160 Viking Blvd. NW Anoka, MN (763)753-6176 Comment [LC16]: This was not discussed at the Planning Commission meeting. Staff agrees with this change.