Laserfiche WebLink
3. Coverage limits <br /> Reimer v.City of A 2005 federal court decision,Reimer v. City of Crookston, created a concern <br /> Crookston,421 F.3d 673, <br /> (8th Circ.,Aug.30,2005). that liability arising from a joint powers entity's activities could exceed the <br /> then statutory tort cap of$1 million. In that case, the Court said a claimant <br /> could make a claim against each political subdivision that was a member of <br /> the joint powers entity, for damages caused by the joint powers entity's <br /> activities. The Court also ruled that a claimant could"stack"the statutory <br /> liability limits of each member, effectively multiplying the statutory tort caps <br /> by the number of members in the joint powers entity. <br /> In response to Reimer, the League of Minnesota Cities, in cooperation with <br /> other local government organizations, was successful in getting the state <br /> legislature to address the concerns caused by this decision. The state <br /> Minn.Stat.§471.59. legislature amended the joint powers law by adding two provisions. <br /> • The amendment provides that a governmental unit is liable for the acts or <br /> omissions of another governmental unit in a joint venture or joint <br /> enterprise only if it has so agreed in writing. <br /> • The amendment provides that governmental units operating together under <br /> the Joint Powers Act, and any joint boards created thereunder, are a single <br /> governmental unit. The total liability for the governmental units and any <br /> joint board may not exceed the limits on liability for a single <br /> governmental unit. <br /> The joint powers amendment became effective on May 25, 2006. The risk of <br /> liability for the activities of a joint powers entity is now no greater than the <br /> risk of liability for a single political subdivision acting alone. A city,however, <br /> will still be separately liable for its own independent acts or omissions that are <br /> not related to the actions of the joint powers entity. <br /> In addition to these provisions,part of the legislation that addressed the"limit <br /> stacking"problem like that exhibited in Reimer was to amend the municipal <br /> Minn.Stat.§466.04. tort law to increase the tort caps, which today stands at$500,000 per claimant <br /> and$1.5 million per occurrence. <br /> It is important to keep in mind that there is still a risk of liability above the tort <br /> caps because some types of claims are not governed by the statutory liability <br /> limits, such as a federal civil rights claim. For this reason, LMCIT's liability <br /> See Section ILD,Coverage coverage provides a higher limit of$2 million per occurrence for both a joint <br /> limits and Section II.D.3, powers entity and an individual city. There could still be the risk of liability <br /> Purchasing higher liability above this limit, which is why it's important for one city or a number of cities <br /> limits. <br /> cooperating together as a joint powers entity to consider carrying the LMCIT <br /> excess liability coverage. <br /> 77 <br />