My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.4. ERMUSR 05-10-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2016
>
05-10-2016
>
2.4. ERMUSR 05-10-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2016 9:13:31 AM
Creation date
5/10/2016 9:13:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/10/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
See Section III. Se <br /> Q,Separate <br /> A housing and redevelopment authority(HRA), economic development <br /> city boards and <br /> commissions. authority(EDA), or port authority is itself a separate political subdivision. If <br /> the city EDA, for example, is named as a covered party on the city's coverage <br /> and a claim were made that involved both the city and the EDA,theoretically <br /> the claimant might be able to recover up to $1.5 million from both the city and <br /> the EDA, since there are two political subdivisions involved. Excess coverage <br /> See Section II.D.3, is one way to provide enough coverage limits to address this situation. <br /> Purchasing higher liability <br /> limits. Another solution is for the HRA, EDA, or port authority to carry separate <br /> liability coverage in its own name. <br /> LMC information memo, The issue of multiple covered parties can also arise is if the city has agreed by <br /> Making and Managing City <br /> Contracts,Section contract to name another entity as a covered party, or to defend and indemnify <br /> IV.B.I.b,Additional another entity. <br /> insured provisions. <br /> e. Courts may overturn statutory liability limits <br /> Cities sometimes carry higher coverage limits because of a concern the courts <br /> might overturn the statutory liability limits. However,those limits have now <br /> been tested and upheld several times in Minnesota. While it's always possible <br /> that a future court might decide to throw out the statutory limits, this is now <br /> less of a concern. <br /> Ill. Coverage details on specific liability <br /> exposures <br /> The LMCIT liability coverage is broad,but there are a number of situations <br /> where the city needs to take additional action or be aware of special coverage <br /> terms and limits. <br /> A. Airports <br /> LMCIT offers optional airport liability coverage to members of the <br /> property/casualty program. Coverage is available for airports that are operated <br /> by a city,by a joint powers entity that includes at least one city, or by a <br /> special purpose district. Coverage is available for most municipal airports; <br /> however, larger airports that have scheduled service are not eligible. <br /> 1. Coverage limits <br /> The airport liability coverage is very broad and carries a per occurrence limit <br /> of$2 million and an annual aggregate limit of$3 million. It is subject to the <br /> same deductibles that apply to the city's municipal liability coverage. Higher <br /> See Section ILD.3, <br /> Purchasing higher liability limits can be provided through LMCIT's optional excess liability coverage, <br /> limits. although it is not available as an option for airport risks only. <br /> 63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.