7.6. SR 03-21-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

9. More than one principal building may be constructed on a lot within a PUD if author'.Zed by the council. Unless otherwise permitted by the council, a PUD shall comply with the schedules of dimensional regulations set forth in this article, except that individual lots shall have no less than 80 percent of the minimum area for similar uses. The applicant is only proposing one principal building, and the parcel would be at least 80 percent of the of the minimum 1 acre parcel required for a similar use. Submittal of a unified landscape plan is also a requirement, and should be included as a condition if recommended for approval. Approval of a PUD also requires satisfying all of the conditions for approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Conditions for approval are as follows: 7. mill not endanger, injure or detrimentally affect the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience orgeneral welfare of the neighborhood or the city. The project will not detrimentally affect the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. 2. mill be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. mill not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant propery. The project will not impede development and improvement of surround vacant property. All of the surrounding properties are already developed, or are located within the flood plain and are not buildable. 4. mill be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facilities and services including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, refuse disposal, mater and sewer systems, parks and schools; and will not, in particular, create traffic congestion or interference with traffic on adjacent and neighboring public thoroughfares. The property will be served by city sewer and water. 5. mill not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons or property because of excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or vibrations. Does not appear to involve activities that would be detrimental to surrounding properties as proposed. 6. mill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. There is the potential for the destruction, loss or damage of a natural scenic feature. The project is proposed to be constructed within the required bluff setback and mild and Scenic River District Ordinances. Impacts to these areas were evaluated by the DNR and their recommendation is to deny the application based on reduced bluff setbacks, the need for more open space, building height, and insufficient parking. 7. mill fully co*ywitb all other requirements of this Code, including any applicable requirements and standards for the issuance of a license or permit to establish and operate the proposed use in the ci y. The project, as proposed, does not meet all requirements of the city code. However, the applicant applied for a PUD which allows flexibility from the strict application of the ordinance. The city is not required to grant all requests for deviation from the ordinance, but can allow changes deemed appropriate after considering potential impacts. Planning Commission The applicant spoke regarding staff s concerns related to parking and stormwater. He noted the current project includes 219 parking stalls, which equates to 2 stalls per residential unit (ordinance is 2.5 stalls). He noted that Granite Shores is at 1.75 stalls per unit and that he has toured other facilities where 1 stall per unit is required. Staff noted that the Granite Shores property directs resident overflow parking to