RES 16-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

b. The Commission voted 5-0-1 (Commissioner Johnson abstained) to deny the Conditional Use Permit application based on the following: (1) Criteria #2 is not met - The project is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. (2) Criteria #3 is not met - A non -conforming land use could impede the normal and orderly development of the surrounding vacant properties as planned for in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. (3) Criteria #7 is not met — The proposed use does not meet the definition of a "hotel" as defined in city ordinance section 30-1. 14, On Fcbruary 16, 2016, the City Council reviewed the Application, and received additional testimony from the applicant. 15. The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission's recommendation and, based on the record generated Bil these Proceedings makes the following findings of fact related to the Land Use Amendment and Conditional Use Permit applications submitted by Applicant: a. The Land Use Amendment and the proposed use are not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; b. The Land Use Amendment and the. proposed use are not compatible with surrounding properties; Without the Land Use Amendment, the Conditional Use Permit cannot be approved as the request is not consistent with the comprehensive plan, as required per criteria number two in section 30-654-, d. Approval of the Conditional Use Pelltnlit would impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property, in accordance with item number three of section 30-654; and e. The proposed use does not satisfy criteria number seven of section 30-654, as the request is not consistent with the definition of hotel as defined in section 30-01 and therefore will not comply with all requirements of the code. 16. Taking into consideration a.11 of the testimony and evidence received, the City Council finds that the Applicant has not established that it has met the requirements for approval of a Land Use Amendment or Conditional Use Permit, and that it would not be in the public interest to approve the Application.