My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. EDSR 12-13-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2004
>
12-13-2004
>
6.0. EDSR 12-13-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2016 4:13:25 PM
Creation date
2/4/2016 4:13:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
12/13/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EHLERS <br /> • &. , , SOC ,, - ES MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: December 10, 2004 <br /> TO: Catherine Mehelich, City of Elk River <br /> FROM: Sid Inman, Ehlers and Associates Inc <br /> RE: City-Owned Industrial/Business Park Development Options <br /> This memo is regarding the EDA and the City owned industrial/business park land. The EDA/City are <br /> considering developing the parcels they both own into industrial park uses and are beginning a process to <br /> determine the best way to proceed. <br /> It has been our experience that to insure that the EDA/City achieve there goals for development, a <br /> request-for-proposals (RFP)process works best. Using a RFP process insures that the EDA/City will <br /> receive the highest price for the property, development to the highest and best uses and allow the <br /> EDA/City to control the process. Further, if business assistance is needed this process will insure that any <br /> assistance will be given with the minimum needed to make the project financially feasible. <br /> The EDA/City would prepare RFP materials giving the developers some general information regarding <br /> • the sites and also includes the EDA/City goals for the type and quality of development they want. Items <br /> could include: <br /> 1. Maps of the two areas <br /> 2. Zoning code for the area <br /> 3. City/EDA's development goals for the area. i.e. size of buildings,types of buildings, <br /> quality of material. <br /> 4. Public improvements that are currently in both areas <br /> 5. An estimate of future public improvement needs. <br /> 6. Public Improvements may include City assessment bonds. <br /> 7. A schedule of Sac Wac and Park dedication fees. <br /> 8. A copy of the City business subsidy policy. <br /> 9. A copy of the City tax increment/abatement policy. <br /> We would then ask the developer to give us their view of the market place. <br /> 1. A description of the types, sizes and usage of the buildings they think they can market. <br /> 2. An estimate of the assessor's market value of buildings when completed. <br /> 3. An estimate of the build-out of the two areas by year. <br /> 4. When adding in Sac,Wac,Park dedication fees, current special assessments and future <br /> public improvements,what is the developers estimate of the amount a third party would <br /> or could pay for sq. ft. of land. <br /> 5. What would their development fee and overhead expenses be. <br /> • The EDA/City could review the RFPs and,if necessary,have interviews with the developers that seem to <br /> achieve the goals of the EDA/City. Once a developer is selected the EDA/City could begin to negotiate a <br /> master development agreement that would be the controlling legal document for the entire site. It would <br /> contain all of the details as to price paid for land, what would be build,timing on phases, and amount and <br /> method of delivery of assistance(if any is needed). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.