My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
1993-1999
>
1998
>
03-10-1998 SPECIAL
>
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 2:40:55 PM
Creation date
12/2/2015 2:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
3/10/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
time schedule and fees associated with processing an application for <br /> assistance. <br /> • The availability of funding will shape the program. <br /> It is inevitable that funding and design decisions will be made concur- <br /> rently. It is likely that an allocation of existing funds will be needed to <br /> start the program. The amount of available funds will shape decisions <br /> about the design of the loan program. At the same time, the nature of <br /> the loan and grant program will influence the amount of funding need- <br /> ed. The end result will reflect a balance between funds and perceived <br /> ability to influence development in the Downtown. <br /> Tax abatement may offer a more attractive alternative to tax increment financ- Evaluate the use of <br /> ing for the rehabilitation of smaller buildings. Tax increment financing creates tax abatement <br /> revenue only on the taxable value in excess of value in existence at the time of <br /> District creation. Rehabilitation may not add significant value. Timing is <br /> another issue. The mechanics of the property tax system may create a two <br /> year lag between improvements and the receipt of tax increment revenues. <br /> Tax abatement addresses both of these issues. It is possible to abate the entire <br /> tax bill, not just the incremental value from rehabilitation. The abatement <br /> takes effect sooner -- with the next available tax year. Issues to consider in <br /> planning for use of tax abatement in the Downtown area include: <br /> • Coordinate with School District and County. <br /> Each political subdivision must separately abate its share of property <br /> taxes. At an early stage in the planning process, it would be important <br /> to meet with the School District and County to determine their interest <br /> in participating in an abatement program for the Downtown and if so, <br /> how to step up a process for considering projects. <br /> • Coordinate with other local efforts. <br /> The use of tax abatement should be part of an overall economic incen- <br /> tive package. Since abatements are granted by the City Council, the <br /> EDA operates loan and grants and the HRA administers the TIF dis- <br /> tricts, coordination of local efforts will be important to making best use <br /> of financial resources. <br /> • Target properties. <br /> Key redevelopment parcels in the Downtown are located within a TIF <br /> district. Tax abatement cannot be granted to property in a TIF district. <br /> Therefore, some consideration should be given to the properties that <br /> could receive greater benefit from abatement than from tax increment. <br /> Target parcels might include existing buildings requiring facade and <br /> interior renovation. <br /> A New Bridge <br /> Revftalwng Montkeffo's Downtown and Rlverfront - <br /> Page 4:23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.