My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
1993-1999
>
1998
>
03-10-1998 SPECIAL
>
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 2:40:55 PM
Creation date
12/2/2015 2:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
3/10/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Links to <br /> Understanding the tools that are available to finance development activities <br /> Implementation <br /> and public improvements is only part of the solution. Implementation requires <br /> connecting these tools to the Downtown Plan. The following section offers <br /> some strategies for making effective use of the financial resources need to <br /> implement the Plan. <br /> Tax increment financing is the essential piece of the finance plan. Making Use TIF wisely <br /> effective use of TIF will directly influence the ability to implement this plan. <br /> While it is impossible to predict the actual implementation steps, it is possible <br /> to offer some reasonable observations about development and TIF: <br /> • Development activities at the River and the Mall anchor the Plan. <br /> Development projects and related improvements at these locations are <br /> likely to require full use of resulting tax increment revenues. The City <br /> should not anticipate that these projects will produce excess tax incre- <br /> ment that can be used for other projects. <br /> • Tax increment will be needed to fill the gap on Walnut Street. The pri- <br /> mary funding for the reconstruction and enhancement of Walnut Street <br /> will be City funds for street maintenance and special assessments to <br /> adjacent (and benefitting) properties. The use of special assessments <br /> must seek a balance between a fair share of improvement costs and a <br /> level that becomes an economic barrier to operating a business on <br /> Walnut. <br /> In this context, it is likely that general revenues and assessments will not <br /> be sufficient to finance the project. Tax increment holds the potential to <br /> fill all or a portion of the gap. <br /> • Smaller projects play an important role in the revitalization of the <br /> Downtown. New facades and interior rehabilitation may not produce <br /> much tax increment revenue. For this reason, a loan and grant program <br /> offers a more effective finance strategy. The tax increment revenue <br /> from these projects could, however, be targeted for replenishing the loan <br /> fund. <br /> • Plan for meeting local contribution requirements. Successful implemen- <br /> tation of the Downtown Plan will create development and increase the <br /> amount of the local contribution for 1'!r District 1-22. Funding of the <br /> local contribution should be considered as part of overall implementa- <br /> tion. Other public funding for the Downtown Plan should be evaluated <br /> for its ability to meet the statutory criteria. <br /> • Implementation plans must account for TIF time constraints. Strategies <br /> to revitalize the Downtown must keep track of the limits that apply to <br /> TIF District 1-22 in the fourth and fifth years following certification. <br /> • <br /> A New Bridge <br /> Revitalizing Monticello's Downtown and Rhrerfront• - - <br /> Page 4:21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.